{
  "id": 6046277,
  "name": "William H. Barrett et al. v. Nicholas V. Boddie",
  "name_abbreviation": "Barrett v. Boddie",
  "decision_date": "1895-11-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "648",
  "last_page": "648",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "158 Ill. 648"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 77,
    "char_count": 812,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.573,
    "sha256": "bb54f84fc1be97c08872d626ca6e4460ec200b6f7ec52cc32ec0f675e25d8547",
    "simhash": "1:f82fdf7b723068e2",
    "word_count": 137
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:03:19.054279+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William H. Barrett et al. v. Nicholas V. Boddie."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nThe parties to this cause and the questions involved are the same as in Barrett v. Boddie, (ante, p. 479.) The reasoning there employed is applicable here and must control the decision of this case, and no further opinion will be filed.\nThe judgment of the Appellate Court will be affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Charles H. Jackson, and Hollett & Tinsman, for appellants.",
      "Woolfolk & Browning, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William H. Barrett et al. v. Nicholas V. Boddie.\nFiled at Ottawa\nNovember 1, 1895.\nThe questions involved in this case are the same as those in Barrett v. Boddie, {ante, p. 479,) and the reasoning in that case is applicable here.\nAppeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;\u2014heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; .the Hon. Abner Smith, Judge, presiding.\nCharles H. Jackson, and Hollett & Tinsman, for appellants.\nWoolfolk & Browning, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0648-01",
  "first_page_order": 648,
  "last_page_order": 648
}
