{
  "id": 3103908,
  "name": "Charles B. Farwell v. Bessie McLeod Sturges et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Farwell v. Sturges",
  "decision_date": "1896-11-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "275",
  "last_page": "276",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "165 Ill. 275"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "58 Ill. App. 462",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5085589
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/58/0462-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 160,
    "char_count": 1794,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.591,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.5330875625009783e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2839982176567051
    },
    "sha256": "4d822099037f36d15625c2fd233ee8da41b5a7af69027beaf7e89ef5b9c52a93",
    "simhash": "1:55edcbcf78a18ec3",
    "word_count": 311
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:27:20.766229+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Charles B. Farwell v. Bessie McLeod Sturges et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nThis is an appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming a decree rendered in the circuit court of Cook county by the Hon. Murray F. Tuley, one of the judges of that court, in a proceeding wherein certain matters in controversy between appellant and others were submitted to said judge for decision under the act of the General Assembly entitled \u201cAn act to enable parties to avoid delay in the administration of justice,\u201d in force July 1, 1887. (Hurd\u2019s Stat. 1895, p. 1169.) As the decree involved, so far as the appellant is concerned, only the payment of money, he took his appeal to the Appellate Court, but the decree is the same as in Farwell v. Sturges, (ante, p. 252,) which was by writ of error brought directly to this court, the title to real estate claimed by John V. Farwell being involved.\nAs the only question necessary to be considered is one of jurisdiction below to render the decree, and as that question is considered and disposed of in the other case, reference may be had to the opinion therein filed for the grounds of affirmance. For the reasons there stated the judgment of the Appellate Court will be affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Tenney, McConnell & Coffeen, (S. P. Shops, of counsel,) for appellant.",
      "Monroe & Thornton, and Moran, Kraus & Mayer, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Charles B. Farwell v. Bessie McLeod Sturges et al.\nFiled at Ottawa November 9, 1896\nRehearing denied March 6, 1897.\nThe opinion in the case of Farwell v. Sturges, (ante, p. 252,) is referred to for a discussion and decision of the question of jurisdiction here involved.\nFarwell v. Sturges, 58 Ill. App. 462, a firmed.\nAppeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;\u2014heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. M. F. Tuley, Judge, presiding.\nTenney, McConnell & Coffeen, (S. P. Shops, of counsel,) for appellant.\nMonroe & Thornton, and Moran, Kraus & Mayer, for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0275-01",
  "first_page_order": 275,
  "last_page_order": 276
}