{
  "id": 3092276,
  "name": "The City of Charleston v. Richard Cadle",
  "name_abbreviation": "City of Charleston v. Cadle",
  "decision_date": "1897-10-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "647",
  "last_page": "647",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "167 Ill. 647"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "166 Ill. 487",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5496955
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/166/0487-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 100,
    "char_count": 1232,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.568,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.0371977565100911e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5498141011309926
    },
    "sha256": "cb30ca8a4bf3e5b5720a36dc652dba1f6758a17a59723d718e92b1dd1542eba8",
    "simhash": "1:3513bafd1975fd1a",
    "word_count": 216
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:20:17.357406+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The City of Charleston v. Richard Cadle."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Chief Justice Phillips\nannounced the opinion of the court:\nIn this case an opinion was filed with which counsel in the case seemed to be content. The opinion was duly published in 166 Ill. 487, and certain attorneys who were not engaged in the case applied for leave to appear as amicus curias and file a brief in this case and a petition for rehearing. We have heretofore, in the Northern Grand Division, when the question was presented to us, refused to permit persons who were not attorneys in the case in any way, to appear and file briefs unless it was at the request or assent of the attorneys engaged in the cause, and this motion to appear as amicus curice, and motion to file briefs in the case and a petition for rehearing, are denied. The cause is stricken.\nStricken from docket.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Chief Justice Phillips"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The City of Charleston v. Richard Cadle.\nAnnounced orally at Springfield October 12, 1897.\nAmicus curle\u2014not admitted in the cause without consent of attorneys. An attorney will not be permitted to enter a cause as amicus curice, and file brief and petition for rehearing, where the attorneys regularly in the cause neither request nor consent.\nApplication for leave to appear as amicus curice, and file brief and petition for rehearing."
  },
  "file_name": "0647-01",
  "first_page_order": 647,
  "last_page_order": 647
}