{
  "id": 3176389,
  "name": "George Torrence v. The People ex rel. W. E. Peabody",
  "name_abbreviation": "Torrence v. People ex rel. Peabody",
  "decision_date": "1897-12-22",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "234",
  "last_page": "234",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "171 Ill. 234"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 109,
    "char_count": 1069,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.557,
    "sha256": "6397573a9701ac3d84ea28a80bb24dbebcb1e3a7d094f0c753625b64bdcdc1d9",
    "simhash": "1:3e37b076095faec2",
    "word_count": 192
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:15:07.824108+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "George Torrence v. The People ex rel. W. E. Peabody."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nA judgment was entered by the county court in this case against appellant for $180.04,\u2014the aggregate of special taxes levied by the city of Taylorville upon separate lots of land owned by him and situated in different blocks. The report of the city clerk is in the same form as in the case of Hoover v. People ex rel. (ante, p. 182,) and the same questions are involved in the two cases. What is said in that case is equally applicable to this, and need not be repeated.\nThe judgment of the county court is reversed and the cause is remanded.\nReversed and remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. C. McBride, and D. M. Sharp, for appellant.",
      "A. H. Panes, City Attorney, E. A. Humphreys, State\u2019s Attorney, and John E. Hogan, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "George Torrence v. The People ex rel. W. E. Peabody.\nOpinion filed December 22, 1897\nRehearing denied February 15, 1898.\nThe questions involved in this case are disposed of in the opinion rendered in the case of Hoover v. People ex rel. (ante, p.182.)\nAppeal from the County Court of Christian county; the Hon. Lyman G. Grundy, Judg'e, presiding*.\nJ. C. McBride, and D. M. Sharp, for appellant.\nA. H. Panes, City Attorney, E. A. Humphreys, State\u2019s Attorney, and John E. Hogan, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0234-01",
  "first_page_order": 234,
  "last_page_order": 234
}