{
  "id": 3173361,
  "name": "The Argyle Company v. The South Park Commissioners",
  "name_abbreviation": "Argyle Co. v. South Park Commissioners",
  "decision_date": "1898-04-21",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "322",
  "last_page": "322",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "172 Ill. 322"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "171 Ill. 370",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3177494
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "424"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/171/0370-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "171 Ill. 424",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3179350
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/171/0424-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 71,
    "char_count": 765,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.555,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08971295237676019
    },
    "sha256": "b750a2e7dc1d043fb0dec8b45270bf044a90ff3c1b013b7d632b482e0c3ac227",
    "simhash": "1:8868dc3fc9da3008",
    "word_count": 131
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:25:05.189436+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The Argyle Company v. The South Park Commissioners."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nThis case involves the same questions raised and decided in Aldis v. South Park Comrs. 171 Ill. 424, and Bass v. South Paris Comrs. id. 370, and the ruling in those cases must control here. For the reasons stated in the cases cited the judgment of the circuit court will be affirmed. Judgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Johnson & Morrill, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Green, Robbins & Honors, for defendants in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The Argyle Company v. The South Park Commissioners.\nOpinion filed April 21, 1898.\nThis case involves the same questions determined in Bass v. South Park Comrs. 171 Ill. 370, and Al\u00e1is v. South Park Comrs. id. 424, and the decisions in those cases control this.\nWrit op Error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Thomas G. Windes, Judge, presiding.\nJohnson & Morrill, for plaintiff in error.\nGreen, Robbins & Honors, for defendants in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0322-01",
  "first_page_order": 322,
  "last_page_order": 322
}