#### The Supreme Lodge Knights of Honor et al. v. Otto Goldberger et al. for use, etc.

Opinion filed October 24, 1898.

Practice—correct practice on reversal of joint judgment for want of jurisdiction of one defendant. A judgment against two joint defendants is a unit, and where one defendant was not served and did not appear the Appellate Court should reverse the judgment as to both defendants and remand generally, and cannot direct the trial court to enter a several judgment against the defendant served.

Knights of Honor v. Goldberger, 72 Ill. App. 320, reversed.

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on writ of error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Francis Adams, Judge, presiding.

Ashcraft & Gordon, for appellants.

Mr. Justice Wilkin

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an action of assumpsit by appellees, against appellants, jointly. Service was had upon the grand lodge, but no service or appearance is shown as to the defendant Chicago Lodge No. 932 Knights of Honor. The trial court entered judgment against both, and they prosecuted a writ of error to the Appellate Court for the First District. That court reversed the judgment of the trial court but remanded the case, with directions to enter judgment against the grand lodge. The defendants prosecute this appeal. No briefs and arguments- have been filed on behalf .of appellees.

The action of the Appellate Court in directing the trial court to enter judgment ag'ainst one defendant, the verdict and judgment having been against both although only one was served, was manifest error. The judgment was a unit as to both defendants, and should have been reversed as to both and remanded generally. Smith v. *20 Byrd, 2 Gilm. 412; Brockman v. McDonald, 16 Ill. 112; Swift v. Green, 20 id. 173; Williams v. Chalfant, 82 id. 218.

For this error the judgments of the circuit and Appellate Courts will be reversed and the cause remanded to the latter court. „ , 7 , ,

„ , 7 , , Reversed and remanded.