{
  "id": 3152348,
  "name": "John F. Hallissy et al. v. The West Chicago Park Commissioners",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hallissy v. West Chicago Park Commissioners",
  "decision_date": "1899-02-17",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "598",
  "last_page": "598",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "177 Ill. 598"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "167 Ill. 355",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3091467
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/167/0355-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "167 Ill. 355",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3091467
      ],
      "weight": 3,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/167/0355-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 110,
    "char_count": 1217,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.554,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08900924339604355
    },
    "sha256": "bb4c802ffb975bef9fbf4c9ee591050464225e06955b30cec286456ae8ade255",
    "simhash": "1:0268d661f86f43c2",
    "word_count": 214
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:15:23.217651+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "John F. Hallissy et al. v. The West Chicago Park Commissioners."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nThis case is substantially like Farr v. West Chicago Park Comrs. 167 Ill. 355, and it was submitted on the same record. The only difference between the two cases is, the Farr case was an appeal by a part of the property owners from a judgment of confirmation, while this is a writ of error by a part of the property owners. The cases being alike, this must be controlled by Farr v. West Chicago Park Comrs. supra.\nThe judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded as to the property of plaintiffs in error J. F. Hallissy, A. C. Wakeman, T. C. Brockhausen, T. Kerndt and G. M. Kerndt, with directions to reduce the assessment against their lands their proportionate shares of the sums illegally included in the estimate aforesaid, as declared in Farr v. West Chicago Park Comrs. supra.\nReversed and remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Prentiss, Hall & Gregg, for plaintiffs in error.",
      "Francis A. Riddle, and H. S. Mecartney, for defendants in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "John F. Hallissy et al. v. The West Chicago Park Commissioners.\nOpinion filed February 17, 1899.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in Farr v. West Chicago Park Comrs. 167 Ill. 355.\nWrit of Error to the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. C. H. Donnelly, Judge, presiding.\nPrentiss, Hall & Gregg, for plaintiffs in error.\nFrancis A. Riddle, and H. S. Mecartney, for defendants in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0598-01",
  "first_page_order": 598,
  "last_page_order": 598
}