{
  "id": 3146666,
  "name": "The Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Co. v. The People ex rel. Kinzie, Collector of Mercer County",
  "name_abbreviation": " Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. People ex rel. Kinzie",
  "decision_date": "1899-02-17",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "102",
  "last_page": "102",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "178 Ill. 102"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "177 Ill. 78",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3153286
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/177/0078-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "177 Ill. 78",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3153286
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/177/0078-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 78,
    "char_count": 835,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.586,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.380125665320789e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3906575248209452
    },
    "sha256": "b3c162904c6b294d90d41fe27f1ae021518a755d1365f85e43b0af52b54f18a5",
    "simhash": "1:b68aaead4e3deece",
    "word_count": 140
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:17:37.829946+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Co. v. The People ex rel. Kinzie, Collector of Mercer County."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Phillips\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThe questions presented on this record are identical with those presented in St. Louis, Rock Island and Chicago Railroad Co. v. People ex rel. 177 Ill. 78. It is unnecessary to repeat the reasoning of that opinion. What is there said is conclusive of this case, and the judgment of the county court of Mercer county is reversed.\nJudgment reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Phillips"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Grier & Stewart, for appellant.",
      "James M. Brock, State\u2019s Attorney, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Co. v. The People ex rel. Kinzie, Collector of Mercer County.\nOpinion filed February 17, 1899.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in St. Louis, Rock Island and Chicago Railroad Co. v. People ex rel. 177 Ill. 78.\nAppeal from the County Court of Mercer county; the Hon. J. H. Connell, Judge, presiding.\nGrier & Stewart, for appellant.\nJames M. Brock, State\u2019s Attorney, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0102-01",
  "first_page_order": 102,
  "last_page_order": 102
}