{
  "id": 5548864,
  "name": "Mary A. Prescott v. The West Chicago Park Commissioners",
  "name_abbreviation": "Prescott v. West Chicago Park Commissioners",
  "decision_date": "1899-10-16",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "194",
  "last_page": "194",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "181 Ill. 194"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 72,
    "char_count": 747,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.58,
    "sha256": "b968e801db8fc22f52c40b34e560576c5dea6eeb92e575db4385c05cfd5a6dd9",
    "simhash": "1:30ce3e77c02443c2",
    "word_count": 126
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:59:48.138368+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Mary A. Prescott v. The West Chicago Park Commissioners."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nThis is an appeal from the county court of Cook county confirming a special tax levied against the property of appellant for improving Douglas Park boulevard, in the city of Chicago. The only controverted question in the case is settled by the decision in Cummings v. West Chicago Park Comrs. (ante, p. 136.)\nThe judgment of the county court will be affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "W. P. Qtjinby, for appellant.",
      "Francis A. Riddle, and H. S. Mecartney, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Mary A. Prescott v. The West Chicago Park Commissioners.\nOpinion filed October 16, 1899.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in Oummings v. West Chicago Park Comrs. (ante, p. 136.)\nAppeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. W. T. Hodson, Judge, presiding.\nW. P. Qtjinby, for appellant.\nFrancis A. Riddle, and H. S. Mecartney, for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0194-01",
  "first_page_order": 194,
  "last_page_order": 194
}