{
  "id": 5549163,
  "name": "George B. Cruickshank et al. v. The City of Chicago",
  "name_abbreviation": "Cruickshank v. City of Chicago",
  "decision_date": "1899-10-19",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "415",
  "last_page": "416",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "181 Ill. 415"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "172 Ill. 263",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3173068
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/172/0263-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "172 Ill. 263",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3173068
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/172/0263-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 111,
    "char_count": 1188,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.581,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.16141906342802226
    },
    "sha256": "10a28737a3c44cfa81cc39681c36aad59d2d562990d52515a4b24078ca048f69",
    "simhash": "1:9d62b787d0f25b84",
    "word_count": 209
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:59:48.138368+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "George B. Cruickshank et al. v. The City of Chicago."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nThis is a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the county court of Cook county confirming a special assessment. The ordinance providing for the improvement fails to state the heig'ht of. the curb required to be constructed ou each side of the street, and on account of this 'defect it is claimed that the ordinance is invalid. The ordinance involved, so far as the height of the curb is concerned, is substantially like the ordinance which was held to be invalid in Holden v. City of Chicago, 172 Ill. 263, and the ruling in that case must control here.\nAs to the property set out and described in thg assignment of errors in the record, the judgment of confirmation is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the county court.\nReversed and remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Edgar Bronson Tolman, and Harvey Mitchell Harper, for plaintiffs in error.",
      "Charles S. Thornton, .Corporation Counsel, and John A. May, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "George B. Cruickshank et al. v. The City of Chicago.\nOpinion filed October 19, 1899.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in Holden v. City of Chicago, 172 Ill. 263.\nWrit of Error to the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Colostin D. Myers, Judge, presiding.\nEdgar Bronson Tolman, and Harvey Mitchell Harper, for plaintiffs in error.\nCharles S. Thornton, .Corporation Counsel, and John A. May, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0415-01",
  "first_page_order": 415,
  "last_page_order": 416
}