{
  "id": 3221541,
  "name": "Horace E. Hurlbut et al. v. The City of Chicago",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hurlbut v. City of Chicago",
  "decision_date": "1900-02-21",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "455",
  "last_page": "455",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "184 Ill. 455"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "176 Ill. 207",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3157003
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/176/0207-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "176 Ill. 207",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3157003
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/176/0207-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 99,
    "char_count": 1030,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.609,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.2240919645422112e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6016341107145629
    },
    "sha256": "c71e83c4e2ae8b9bae1017e17453a4ca162b344ae0ff08ea359d907021c891af",
    "simhash": "1:025224a9f67f6c38",
    "word_count": 179
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:06:49.625249+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Horace E. Hurlbut et al. v. The City of Chicago."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nIn these cases judgments were entered by the county court of Cook county confirming special assessments to pay for grading, paving and curbing with curb-stones certain streets in the city of Chicago. In each case the ordinance for the improvement is in all respects like the ordinance passed upon in Lusk v. City of Chicago, 176 Ill. 207. Upon the authority of that case the judgments are reversed and the causes remanded.\nReversed and remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William F. Carroll, and M. F. Cure, for plaintiffs in error.",
      "Charles M. Walker, Corporation Counsel, Armand F. Teefy, and William M. Pindell, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Horace E. Hurlbut et al. v. The City of Chicago.\nOpinion filed February 21, 1900\nRehearing denied April 6, 1900.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in Lusk v. City of Chicago, 176 Ill. 207.\nWrit of Error to the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. C. F. Wheat, Judge, presiding.\nWilliam F. Carroll, and M. F. Cure, for plaintiffs in error.\nCharles M. Walker, Corporation Counsel, Armand F. Teefy, and William M. Pindell, for defendant in error.\nWith this case are determined Nos. 925, Baldwin Estate v. City of Chicago; 943, Mason v. Same; and 958, Donahue v. Same."
  },
  "file_name": "0455-01",
  "first_page_order": 455,
  "last_page_order": 455
}