{
  "id": 3224118,
  "name": "Edward B. Quinlan et al. v. The City of Chicago",
  "name_abbreviation": "Quinlan v. City of Chicago",
  "decision_date": "1900-06-21",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "628",
  "last_page": "628",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "185 Ill. 628"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "176 Ill. 207",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3157003
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/176/0207-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "176 Ill. 207",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3157003
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/176/0207-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 77,
    "char_count": 757,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.586,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.09081031365149088
    },
    "sha256": "d7eb8942c3cc46ecdfb82795c629386c2d253b262d2c4418b07174e56f568826",
    "simhash": "1:125622a8f2ff6478",
    "word_count": 135
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:50:44.032606+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Edward B. Quinlan et al. v. The City of Chicago."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nThe ordinance in this case is like the ordinances condemned by this court in Lusk v. City of Chicago, 176 Ill. 207, and Davidson v. City of Chicago, 178 id. 682, and those cases are conclusive here.\nThe judgment will be reversed and the caus\u00e9 remanded.\nReversed and remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William F, Carroll, and M. F. Cure, for plaintiffs in error.",
      "Charles M. Walker, Corporation Counsel, Armand F. Teefy, and William M. Pindell, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Edward B. Quinlan et al. v. The City of Chicago.\nOpinion filed June 21, 1900.\nThis case is controlled by the decisions in Lusk v. City of Chicago, 176 Ill. 207, and Davidson v. City of Chicago, 178 id. 582.\nWrit of Error to the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Colostin D. Myers, Judge, presiding.\nWilliam F, Carroll, and M. F. Cure, for plaintiffs in error.\nCharles M. Walker, Corporation Counsel, Armand F. Teefy, and William M. Pindell, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0628-01",
  "first_page_order": 628,
  "last_page_order": 628
}