{
  "id": 3226825,
  "name": "Elli A. Beach et al. v. The City of Chicago",
  "name_abbreviation": "Beach v. City of Chicago",
  "decision_date": "1900-06-21",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "208",
  "last_page": "208",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "186 Ill. 208"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "172 Ill. 263",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3173068
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/172/0263-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "172 Ill. 263",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3173068
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/172/0263-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 100,
    "char_count": 1017,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.564,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.09088000883449189
    },
    "sha256": "3d397ad820595cbc383761f12bca32f396a9f7f21fec96e8e0e0b54ae423cc45",
    "simhash": "1:0852f492c44f4318",
    "word_count": 174
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:21:15.353008+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Elli A. Beach et al. v. The City of Chicago."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nElli A. Beach and others, plaintiffs in error, complain that the county court of Cook county erred in confirming a special assessment upon their lots for putting in a combined curb and gutter on Drexel avenue and certain other streets in Chicago; that the ordinance was invalid because it did not sufficiently describe the combined curb and gutter. The ordinance was insufficient in substantially -the same respects as the one involved in Holden v. City of Chicago, 172 Ill. 263, which was held invalid.\nThe judgment of confirmation is reversed and the cause remanded.\nReversed and remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "W. F. Carroll, and M. F. Cure, for plaintiffs in error.",
      "Charles M. Walker, Corporation Counsel, Armand F. Teefy, and Denis E. Sullivan\", for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Elli A. Beach et al. v. The City of Chicago.\nOpinion filed June 21, 1900.\nThis case is decided upon the authority of Holden v. City of Chicago, 172 Ill. 263.\nWrit of Error to the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Orrin N. Carter, Judge, presiding.\nW. F. Carroll, and M. F. Cure, for plaintiffs in error.\nCharles M. Walker, Corporation Counsel, Armand F. Teefy, and Denis E. Sullivan\", for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0208-01",
  "first_page_order": 208,
  "last_page_order": 208
}