{
  "id": 3231747,
  "name": "Elizabeth Boyd et al. v. The City of Chicago",
  "name_abbreviation": "Boyd v. City of Chicago",
  "decision_date": "1900-10-19",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "115",
  "last_page": "115",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "187 Ill. 115"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 97,
    "char_count": 1020,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.601,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.7710994026850012e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7118386052623146
    },
    "sha256": "5e2282d644144f8cdc447b15e122e988c3b0b85a6fe1ca9561b92238a756e068",
    "simhash": "1:445587b1e65857f0",
    "word_count": 180
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:39:43.135598+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Elizabeth Boyd et al. v. The City of Chicago."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nThe above case, and the four cases decided with it, are writs of error to the county court of Cook county to reverse judgments affirming special assessments for the improvement of streets in the city of Chicago. In all material respects these cases are like the case of Kuester v. City of Chicago, (ante, p. 21,) and on the authority of that case and others therein cited the judgments of the county court must be reversed and the causes remanded.\nReversed and remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "George W. Wilbur, for plaintiffs in error.",
      "Charles M. Walker, Corporation Counsel, Armand F. Teefy, and William M. Pindell, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Elizabeth Boyd et al. v. The City of Chicago.\nOpinion filed October 19, 1900.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in Kuester v. City of Chicago, (ante, p. 21.)\nWrit of Error to the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. P. H. Sanford, Judge, presiding.\nGeorge W. Wilbur, for plaintiffs in error.\nCharles M. Walker, Corporation Counsel, Armand F. Teefy, and William M. Pindell, for defendant in error.\nWith this case are decided Nos. 946, Martin v. City of Chicago; 954, Ingalls v. Same; 961, Haines v. Same; and 850, Betcher v. Same."
  },
  "file_name": "0115-01",
  "first_page_order": 115,
  "last_page_order": 115
}