{
  "id": 3231309,
  "name": "Christian W. Anderson v. The City of Chicago",
  "name_abbreviation": "Anderson v. City of Chicago",
  "decision_date": "1900-10-19",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "264",
  "last_page": "264",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "187 Ill. 264"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 90,
    "char_count": 868,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.611,
    "sha256": "a84abc92f32dd03b87f96e473a9aebe182e971ff7c9b5fade4bf11e54ca31452",
    "simhash": "1:0847a638c2bf56d6",
    "word_count": 149
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:39:43.135598+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Christian W. Anderson v. The City of Chicago."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nIn these cases the ordinances are defective in not describing the \u201cfiat stones\u201d on which the curb-stones provided for in the improvement were to rest. Their decision must follow that made in Kuester v. City of Chicago, (ante, p. 21.) The judgment of confirmation in each case is reversed and the cause remanded.\nReversed and remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William F. Carroll, and M. F. Cure, for plaintiffs in error.",
      "Charles M. Walker, Corporation Counsel, Armand F. Teefy, and William M. Pindell, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Christian W. Anderson v. The City of Chicago.\nOpinion filed October 19, 1900.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in Kuester v. City of Chicago, (ante, p. 21.)\nWrit op Error to the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Orrin N. Carter, Judge, presiding.\nWilliam F. Carroll, and M. F. Cure, for plaintiffs in error.\nCharles M. Walker, Corporation Counsel, Armand F. Teefy, and William M. Pindell, for defendant in error.\nWith this case are decided No. 911, Greenough v. City of Chicago, and No. 960, Thompson v. Same."
  },
  "file_name": "0264-01",
  "first_page_order": 264,
  "last_page_order": 264
}