{
  "id": 3230059,
  "name": "The Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Andrew Peterson, for use, etc.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hartford Fire Insurance v. Peterson",
  "decision_date": "1900-10-19",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "395",
  "last_page": "395",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "187 Ill. 395"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "87 Ill. App. 567",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5274422
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/87/0567-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "186 Ill. 491",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3227180
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/186/0491-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "186 Ill. 491",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3227180
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/186/0491-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 87,
    "char_count": 950,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.601,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 9.672362979360316e-08,
      "percentile": 0.528948019749414
    },
    "sha256": "755c54f04b74f4b5788b0887d1662dae326c33b514a2ef492273cfdbac878e8a",
    "simhash": "1:d177faaf286d68f2",
    "word_count": 160
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:39:43.135598+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Andrew Peterson, for use, etc."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nThe question involved in this appeal is the same as the question involved in the case of Osgood v. Skinner, 186 Ill. 491. The decision in that case governs and controls this case. The order, therefore, of the Appellate Court to the circuit court of Cook county to enter a judgment for damages-and interest is reversed and the cause is remanded to the Appellate Court, with directions to modify its judgment by striking out said order.\nReversed and remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Bates & Harding, for appellant.",
      "D. F. Flannery, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Andrew Peterson, for use, etc.\nOpinion filed October 19, 1900.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in Osgood v. Skinner, 186 Ill. 491.\nPeterson v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. 87 Ill. App. 567, reversed.\nAppeal from the Branch Appellate Court for the First District;\u2014heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook count}?; the Hon. Elbridge Hanecy, Judge, presiding.\nBates & Harding, for appellant.\nD. F. Flannery, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0395-01",
  "first_page_order": 395,
  "last_page_order": 395
}