{
  "id": 3229619,
  "name": "Nels Johnson et al. v. The City of Chicago",
  "name_abbreviation": "Johnson v. City of Chicago",
  "decision_date": "1900-10-19",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "407",
  "last_page": "407",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "187 Ill. 407"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 89,
    "char_count": 881,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.605,
    "sha256": "f5bbf05a384f7fdbe67ab8f9e6a2a93638d6993ab4e3d01a95a5c1411acbc1f6",
    "simhash": "1:20512b28eed94b96",
    "word_count": 156
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:39:43.135598+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Nels Johnson et al. v. The City of Chicago."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nUpon the authority of Kuester v. City of Chicago, (ante, p. 21,) the judgment in the above entitled case and those in the three cases decided with it will be reversed and the causes will be remanded to the county court of Cook county for further proceedings in conformity with the views expressed in the above entitled cause.\nReversed and remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Ives, Mason & Wyman, for plaintiffs in error.",
      "Charles M. Walker, Corporation Counsel, Armand F. Teefy, and Denis E. Sullivan, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Nels Johnson et al. v. The City of Chicago.\nOpinion filed October 19, 1900.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in Kuester v. City of Chicago, (ante, p. 21.)\nWrit of Error to the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Orrin N. Carter, Judge, presiding.\nIves, Mason & Wyman, for plaintiffs in error.\nCharles M. Walker, Corporation Counsel, Armand F. Teefy, and Denis E. Sullivan, for defendant in error.\nWith this case are decided No. 930, Sweet v. City of Chicago; No. 895, Libby v. Same; and No. 947, Baker v. Same."
  },
  "file_name": "0407-01",
  "first_page_order": 407,
  "last_page_order": 407
}