{ "id": 3234175, "name": "The People ex rel. William F. Herndon et al. v. Charles E. Opel, County Clerk", "name_abbreviation": "People ex rel. Herndon v. Opel", "decision_date": "1900-12-20", "docket_number": "", "first_page": "194", "last_page": "205", "citations": [ { "type": "official", "cite": "188 Ill. 194" } ], "court": { "name_abbreviation": "Ill.", "id": 8772, "name": "Illinois Supreme Court" }, "jurisdiction": { "id": 29, "name_long": "Illinois", "name": "Ill." }, "cites_to": [ { "cite": "7 Ind. 326", "category": "reporters:state", "reporter": "Ind.", "case_ids": [ 1469132 ], "opinion_index": -1, "case_paths": [ "/ind/7/0326-01" ] }, { "cite": "103 Ill. 125", "category": "reporters:state", "reporter": "Ill.", "case_ids": [ 2803170 ], "opinion_index": -1, "case_paths": [ "/ill/103/0125-01" ] }, { "cite": "102 Ill. 218", "category": "reporters:state", "reporter": "Ill.", "case_ids": [ 2812663 ], "opinion_index": -1, "case_paths": [ "/ill/102/0218-01" ] }, { "cite": "50 Mo. 317", "category": "reporters:state", "reporter": "Mo.", "case_ids": [ 980538 ], "opinion_index": -1, "case_paths": [ "/mo/50/0317-01" ] } ], "analysis": { "cardinality": 657, "char_count": 22691, "ocr_confidence": 0.611, "pagerank": { "raw": 2.3897387672512517e-07, "percentile": 0.7977424552551133 }, "sha256": "aaa8d8231955f4057a0c96999ba9b3c3a023d76066072982e6e94e0938c6cdae", "simhash": "1:3a3f46101634ecd4", "word_count": 4003 }, "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:06:15.668919+00:00", "provenance": { "date_added": "2019-08-29", "source": "Harvard", "batch": "2018" }, "casebody": { "judges": [], "parties": [ "The People ex rel. William F. Herndon et al. v. Charles E. Opel, County Clerk." ], "opinions": [ { "text": "Mr. Justice Magruder\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nNo probate court has existed in Sangamon county prior to the filing of the present petition for a writ of mandamus separately and independently of the county court, which has jurisdiction in probate matters. Since, however, the recent census of the United States shows the population of that county to be in excess of 70,000, it is claimed that thereby a probate court has been established in that county. The contention of the relators seems to be that, as soon as the population of a county is ascertained by the next preceding Federal census to be in excess of 70,000, the offices of probate judge and probate clerk are established, and that a vacancy is at once created in those offices, so that, immediately upon the official announcement of the census, it becomes the duty of the county clerk to call an election to fill the alleged vacancy in the office of probate clerk.\nFirst \u2014 The first question, presented by the demurrer to the petition, is whether or not, by the mere official announcement of the census showing a population in excess of 70,000, a probate court is established and the offices of probate judge and probate clerk are created.\nSection 20 of article 6 of the constitution, as quoted in the statement preceding this opinion, provides for the establishment by legislative action of a probate court in each county having a population of over 50,000, and for the election of a judge thereof, whose term of office shall be the same as that of the county judge, \u201cand who shall be elected at the same time and in the same manner.\u201d The mandate of the constitution is clear and emphatic, that the judge of the probate court to be established shall be elected at the same time when the county judge is elected. It then becomes important to ascertain when the judge of the county court is required by law to be elected.\nSection 8 of article 10 of the constitution provides that \u201cin each county there shall be elected the following county officers, at the general election to be held on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November, A. D. 1882: A county judge, county cler-k (and other officers). Each of said officers shall enter upon the duties of his office, respectively, on the first Monday of December, after his election, and they shall hold their respective offices for the term of four years, and until their successors are elected and qualified.\u201d (1 Starr & Curt. Ann. Stat.\u2014 2d ed. \u2014 p. 189).\nIn pursuance of this constitutional provision the legislature passed an act, entitled \u201cAn act to extend the jurisdiction of county courts,\u201d etc., approved March 26, 1874, in force July 1, 1874, section 1 of which provides \u201cthat there-shall be in each of the counties of this State, now created and organized, or which may hereafter be created or organized, a court of record, to be styled \u2018The County Court of........County. \u2019 Said court shall have a seal.\u201d Section 8 of the last named act provides that \u201cthe county judge, in each county, shall be elected on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November in the year 1882, and on Tuesday after the first Monday in November every fourth year thereafter, and shall enter upon the duties of his office on the first Monday in December after his election, and shall hold his office for \u2022four years, and until Ms successor is elected and qualified.\u201d Section 5 of said act provides that \u201ccounty courts shall have jurisdiction in all matters of probate, settlements of estates of deceased persons, appointment of guardians,\u201d etc. (1 Starr & Curt. Ann. Stht. \u2014 2d ed.\u2014 pp. 1175, 1176). Section 16 of the act of April 3, 1872, being\" chapter 46 of the Revised Statutes, provides that \u201cthe county judges and county clerks shall be elected on Tuesday next after the first Monday of November, 1882, and every four years thereafter, and shall enter upon the duties of their offices on the first Monday of December after their election.\u201d (2 Starr & Curt. Ann. Stat. \u2014 2d ed. \u2014 p. 1642).\nInasmuch as, under the constitution and the statutes passed in pursuance thereof, the county judge of Sangamon county was first elected at the general election of November, 1882, and his successor was elected every four years thereafter, to enter upon the duties of the office on the first Monday of December after the election,- it follows that the judge of the county court of Sangamon county must have been elected at the general election in November, 1898, and entered upon the duties of his office on the first day of December, 1898. This being so, his term of office does not expire until December, 1902. At the latter date the election of a county j udge takes place. Consequently, the judge of the probate court to be established in Sangamon county cannot be elected until the general election of November, 1902.\nThe statute of 1877, as amended in 1881, providing for the establishment of probate courts, requires that the clerk of the probate court shall be elected at the same time when the probate judge is elected. Therefore, the clerk of the probate court to be established in Sangam\u00f3n county must be elected at the general election, which takes place in November, 1902. This being so, it is difficult to see how the clerk of the county court can be compelled to call an election for the selection of a clerk of the probate court to be established in Sangamon county before the general election to take place in November, 1902.\nWe are, therefore, of the opinion that it is not sufficient merely that the county shall have the requisite population of 70,000 in order to establish the probate court, but the time must arrive for the election of the judge of the probate court, which is the same time at which the judge of the county court is elected. The court cannot be established until it has a judge. A court has been defined to be \u201ca body in the government organized for the public administration of justice at the time and place prescribed by law;\u201d and it has been said that \u201ca court is an incorporeal being, which requires for its existence the presence of the judge.\u201d (8 Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law, \u2014 2d ed. \u2014 p. 22). If a court cannot exist without the presence of the judge, and the judge cannot be elected until November, 1902, it cannot be said that an election should be called at this time for the selection of the clerk of the court, over which the judge is to preside. Indeed, the act of 1877 expressly provides that the clerk shall not be elected until the judge is elected. When the Federal census determines that the county has a population of over 70,000, the court may then be established and put into operation by electing a probate judge and a probate clerk at the next election at which the county judge is elected. Unless the things required by the constitution for the existence of the court concur, the court cannot exist.\nSecond \u2014 It is claimed, however, on the part of the relators, that a vacancy exists in the office of the clerk of the probate court within the meaning of the law relating to vacancies, and that the county clerk is, on that account, required to call an election to fill the vacancy. This contention proceeds upon the theory, that the official announcement of the census bureau as to the population establishes the probate court and the office of clerk thereof. As this theory cannot be sustained in view of what has already been said, it follows that no vacancy exists to be filled by an election. It has been held, it is true, that a vacancy may exist when an office is created and no one has been appointed to fill it, and it has been said: \u201cAn existing office without an incumbent is vacant whether it be a new or an old one.\u201d (Mechem\u2019s Public Offices and Officers, secs. 127,132, and authorities referred to in notes). But section 125 of the act of 1872, providing for elections, defines specifically what a vacancy is and when it exists. Said section 125 provides that \u201cevery elective office shall become vacant on the happening of either of the following\" events, before the expiration of the term of such office: First \u2014 The death of the incumbent. Second \u2014 His resignation. Third\u2014 His becoming insane. Fourth \u2014 His ceasing to be an inhabitant of the State. * * * Fifth \u2014 His conviction of an infamous crime, or of any offense involving a violation of official oath. Sixth \u2014 His removal from office. Seventh \u2014 His refusal or neglect to take his oath of office, or to give or renew his official bond, or to deposit or file such oath or bond within the time prescribed by law. Eighth \u2014 The decision of a competent tribunal declaring his election void.\u201d (2 Starr & Curt. Ann. Stat. \u2014 2d ed. \u2014 p. 1668). The word, \u201cvacancy,\u201d as used in section 133 of this statute, must refer to such vacancy as is defined in section 125 of the same statute. In section 125 no mention is made of a vacancy in an office before the time fixed by law for filling that office. The expression in section 125, that \u201cevery elective office shall become vacant,\u201d implies that the office is first to exist, because it could not become vacant until it had already existed; and the plain inference is, that it is to be filled before it can become vacant within the meaning of that term, so far as it refers to filling the office by any special proceeding. The statement in section 125, that the events therein referred to are to happen \u201cbefore the expiration of the term of such office\u201d in order to create a vacancy, implies that such events are to occur after the beginning of the. term of office. Here, there has been no beginning of a term of the office of probate clerk. None of the events specified have occurred; hence there is no vacancy, as contemplated by the law.\nMany of the cases, where it has been held that a vacancy may exist as soon as an office is created and before it has been filled at all, proceed largely upon the ground that the performance of the duties of the office is essential, and that an appointment or special election is the only means of securing such performance. In other words, the authorities for the position contended for are based mainly upon the consideration that there is a vacancy when there is no incumbent to perform the duties of the office. Here, however, the county judge elected in November, 1898, and who entered upon the duties of his office on the first Monday in December, 1898, has probate jurisdiction, and can perform the duties of probate judge until December, 1902. So, also, the county clerk elected at the same time and for the same period is probate clerk for the same period. The clerk of the county court can perform until December, 1902, all the official duties of a probate clerk, and, hence, there is now an incumbent duly elected and qualified, who is capable of performing such duties.\nOur conclusion upon the whole matter is that, under the constitution and the statutes of this State, the terms of the probate judge and probate clerk of a probate court to be established begin at the same time as the terms of the county judge and county clerk after it has been officially ascertained that the county has the requisite population; and that there is no vacancy in the office of probate clerk in Sangamon county, which can be filled at this time.\nAccordingly, the demurrer to the petition for the writ of mandamus is sustained, and the prayer of the petition is denied.\nWrit denied.", "type": "majority", "author": "Mr. Justice Magruder" } ], "attorneys": [ "Edward C. Akin, Attorney General, (Clinton L. Conkling, and Albert Salzenstein, of counsel,) for relator:", "E. S. Smith, for respondent:" ], "corrections": "", "head_matter": "The People ex rel. William F. Herndon et al. v. Charles E. Opel, County Clerk.\nOpinion filed December 20, 1900.\n1. Public officers \u2014 a vacancy implies the existence of the office to be filled. The term \u201cvacancy,\u201d as used in sections 125 and 133 of the Election act, (Rev. Stat. 1874, pp. 466, 468,) implies that the office must exist and have been filled.\n2. Courts \u2014 probate judge and clerk for new court can only be elected when the county judge is elected. Under the constitution and statutes of Illinois the terms of office of the probate judge and probate clerk begin at the same time as those of the county judge and county clerk, after it has been officially ascertained that the county has the requisite population, and until such time there are no vacancies in such offices which may be filled by special election called by the county clerk.\n3. Same \u2014 official census announcement does not establish probate court. The official census announcement that a county has a population of 70,000 does not of itself establish a probate court in such county, but such court may be established by the election,of a probate judge at the same time that the next succeeding election for county judge is held.\nOriginal petition for mandamus.\nThis is an original petition for mandamus, filed in this court on October 5, 1900, by the People through the Attorney General upon the relation of William P. Herndon and Fred W. Long, citizens and residents of Sangamon county, praying- that the writ may be issued directed to Charles E. Opel, county clerk of Sangamon county, commanding him forthwith to issue an order appointing a day for the election of a clerk of the probate court of Sangamon county, and cause notice thereof to be given as in other cases of election, as provided in section 133 of chapter 46, entitled \u201cElections,\u201d of the statutes of Illinois.\nSection 133 of chapter 46, -referred to in the prayer of the petition for mandamus, is section 133 of \u201cAn act in regard to elections and to provide for filling vacancies in elective offices,\u201d approved April 3, 1872, in force July 1, 1872, and is as follows: \u201cWhen a vacancy shall occur in the office of county commissioner, State\u2019s attorney, sheriff, coroner, county clerk, recorder of deeds, county treasurer, county surveyor, justice of the peace, constable, or other county or precinct officer not otherwise provided for by law, within one year before the expiration of the term of such vacant office, the vacancy shall be filled by appointment, by the county board of the county in which the vacancy exists; but if such unexpired term exceeds one year, the county clerk, or, in case of a vacancy in his office, the chairman of the county board, shall issue an order appointing a day for an election to fill such vacancy, and cause notice thereof to be given as in other cases of election.\u201d (2 Starr & Curt. Ann. Stat. \u2014 2d ed.\u2014 p. 1670).\nThe petition for mandamus quotes section 20 of article 6 of the State constitution, which provides as follows: \u201cThe General Assembly may provide for the establishment of a probate court in each county having a population of over 50,000, and for the election of a judge thereof, whose term of office shall be the same as that of the county judge, and who shall be elected at the same time and in the same manner. Said courts, when established, shall have original jurisdiction of all probate matters, the settlement of estates of deceased persons, the appointment of guardians and conservators, and settlement of their accounts; in all matters relating to apprentices, and in cases of the sales of real estate of deceased persons for the payment of debts.\u201d (1 Starr & Curt. Ann. Stat. \u2014 2d ed. \u2014 p. 154).\nThe petition then sets forth section 1 of an act passed by the legislature in pursuance of said constitutional provision, said act being known as chapter 37 of the Revised Statutes, and entitled \u201cAn act to establish probate courts in all counties having a population of 70,000 or more, to define the jurisdiction thereof,\u201d etc., approved April 27, 1877, in force July 1, 1877, and amended in 1881 by the substitution of 70,000 for 100,000. Said section 1 of said act of 1877, as amended in 1881, is as follows: \u201cThat there shall be established in each county of this State, now created and organized, or which may be hereafter created and organized, and which has a population of 70,000 or more, a court of record, to be styled \u2018The probate court of (name of) county. \u2019 Such court shall have a seal, and may, from time to time, as may be necessary, renew or alter the same. The expense of such seal, and of renewing and altering the same, shall be paid by the county.\u201d (1 Starr & Curt. Ann. Stat. \u2014 2d ed. \u2014 p. 1194).\nThe petition then avers that said last named act provides for an election of a probate judge and clerk of said court. Section 3, which provides for the election of the judge, is as follows: \u201cThe judge of said court in each county in which such court shall be established shall be elected on the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November, at the same election at which the county judge is elected, and every fourth year thereafter, and shall enter upon the duties of his office on the first Monday of December after his election, and shall hold his office for a term of four years and until his successor is elected and qualified, and shall be known as the probate judge of (name of) county.\u201d (Id. p. 1194). The section-providing for the election of the clerk of said court is section 13 and is as follows: \u201cThere shall be elected at the same time as the probate judge is elected a clerk of the probate court, who shall hold his office for a term of four years and until his successor shall be elected and qualified. Before entering upon the duties of his office he shall take and subscribe the oath required by the constitution of the State.\u201d (Id. p. 1198). Section 24 of said last named act provides as follows: \u201cWhen a vacancy shall occur in the office of judge of the probate court of any county, the clerk of the court in which the vacancy exists shall notify the Governor of such vacancy. If the unexpired term of the office made vacant is less than one year, at the time the vacancy occurs, the Governor shall fill such vacancy by appointment; but if the unexpired term exceeds one year, the Governor shall issue a writ of election as in other cases of vacancy to be filled by election.\u201d (Id. p. 1200).\nThe petition then avers, that the United States government has taken a regular census, being the twelfth, as provided by law, of the population of Sangamon county, and that it has thereby been officially ascertained that said Sangamon county has a population of 71,593; that an official certificate under the hand and seal of the director of said United States census has been filed in the office of the clerk of the county court of Sangamon county, which certificate certifies that the official count of the returns for the twelfth United States census for said county shows the total population of the county to be 71,593, and which said certificate is dated September 26, A. D. 1900.\nIt is also alleged in the petition, that the board of supervisors of said county have already taken steps to fix the salaries of the judge and clerk of said court, and that the two principal political parties in said county have made nominations for said offices of judge and clerk of said probate court to be voted for at the November election in 1900. The petition also avers, that the relators have demanded of the respondent, Opel, said county clerk, and caused written notice to be given him, requesting him to issue an order appointing a day for an election to fill a vacancy in the office of probate clerk in and for the probate court of said county, and to cause notice of said election to be given as in other cases of election, which said written notice, demand or request bears date September 29, 1900, and was served on the same day. The petition then further avers that said Opel, county clerk as aforesaid, refuses to issue said order and give said notice.\nTo this petition for mandamus the respondent Opel, county clerk as aforesaid, has filed a demurrer, thus forming an issue of law upon the allegations of the petition.\nEdward C. Akin, Attorney General, (Clinton L. Conkling, and Albert Salzenstein, of counsel,) for relator:\nThere is nothing in the constitution or statute which requires the first election for probate judge and probate clerk in any county to be held only at the regular election on Tuesday after the first Monday in November, at the same election at which the county judge shall be elected, but there being a vacancy in each of such offices immediately upon the county having a population of 70,000 or more, as determined by the next preceding census of this State or of the United States, an election may j be called as provided for in other cases of vacancy. State v. County Court, 50 Mo. 317.\nThe law creating probate courts goes into effect, as to each county in the State, as soon as such county has the requisite population of 70,000 or more, as officially ascertained by the next preceding State or United States census. Const, of 1870, art. 6, secs. 20, 33; Hurd\u2019s Stat. 1899, \"chap. 37, sec. 216; Knickerbocker v. People, 102 Ill. 218.\nIn counties having a population of 70,000 or more the county court has no jurisdiction in probate matters from the time when the county has that population, as officially ascertained by the next preceding State or United States census. Klokke v. Dodge, 103 Ill. 125; Meserve v. Delaney, 105 id. 53.\nThe statute provides such court shall have a probate judge and clerk. Hurd\u2019s Stat. 1899, chap. 37, secs. 218,228.\nThere being no persons elected or appointed to fill said offices, there exists, in contemplation of law, a vacancy in each of said offices of judge and clerk of the probate court. Throop on Public Officers, sec. 431; Mechem on Public Officers, secs. 127, 132; Stocking v. State, 7 Ind. 326; State v. Hyde, 121 id. 20.\nE. S. Smith, for respondent:\nThe legislature has not declared, simply, that the county clerk shall call an election to fill all vacancies in certain offices, but it has declared what shall constitute a vacancy. (Rev. Stat. chap. 46, sec. 125.) The act declares the \u201coffice shall become vacant upon the happening of either of the following events before the expiration of the term of such office.\u201d Then follow, with numbered precision, eight specified events that shall be deemed to create a vacancy. No mention is made of a vacancy in an office before the time fixed by law for filling that office. The clause \u201cthe office shall become vacant\u201d implies that the office is first to exist and to be filled before it can become vacant within the meaning of that term, so far as it refers to filling the office by any special proceeding.\nAn office cannot be said to be vacant when any person is authorized to act in it and does so act. A constitutional provision authorizing the Governor to fill vacancies applies only when there is no person authorized by law to discharge the duties of the office. Where there is a person so authorized to act temporarily, until the action of the electing or appointing power, the Governor has no power to appoint. Throop on Public Officers, 431." }, "file_name": "0194-01", "first_page_order": 194, "last_page_order": 205 }