{
  "id": 3235540,
  "name": "Charles G. Rose et al. v. The City of Chicago",
  "name_abbreviation": "Rose v. City of Chicago",
  "decision_date": "1900-12-20",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "347",
  "last_page": "347",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "188 Ill. 347"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "176 Ill. 207",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3157003
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/176/0207-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "176 Ill. 207",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3157003
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/176/0207-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 125,
    "char_count": 1348,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.58,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.0910923764281238
    },
    "sha256": "9dc27fdf102b7731489455f3074963e8170b7c7fc7024cec6cb645485ac44bc3",
    "simhash": "1:11f6a1a14db675b4",
    "word_count": 235
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:06:15.668919+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Charles G. Rose et al. v. The City of Chicago."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Chief Justice Boggs\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThis is a writ of error sued out to reverse a judgment entered in the county court of Cook county, confirming a special assessment levied by virtue of an ordinance of the city for the purpose of paying the cost of grading, paving and curbing Vernon avenue from Sixty-ninth to Seventy-third street, in said city.\nThe objection that the ordinance provides the curbing shall rest on \u201cfiat stones,\u201d and for that reason does not, on its face, sufficiently describe the nature, character, locality and description of the proposed improvement, is the same objection that we held in Lusk v. City of Chicago, 176 Ill. 207, and Kuester v. City of Chicago, 187 id. 21, should have been sustained in the trial court. On the authority of those cases the judgment in this cause must be and is reversed and the cause remanded.\nReversed and remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Chief Justice Boggs"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William P. Carroll, for plaintiffs in error.",
      "Charles M. Walker, Corporation Counsel, Denis E. Sullivan, and William M. Pindell, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Charles G. Rose et al. v. The City of Chicago.\nOpinion filed December 20, 1900.\nThis case is controlled by the decisions in Lusk v. City of Chicago, 176 Ill. 207, and Kuester v. City of Chicago, 187 id. 21.\nWrit of Error to the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Orrin N. Carter, Judge, presiding.\nWilliam P. Carroll, for plaintiffs in error.\nCharles M. Walker, Corporation Counsel, Denis E. Sullivan, and William M. Pindell, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0347-01",
  "first_page_order": 347,
  "last_page_order": 347
}