{
  "id": 5573504,
  "name": "Magic T. Smith et al. v. The City of Chicago",
  "name_abbreviation": "Smith v. City of Chicago",
  "decision_date": "1901-02-20",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "341",
  "last_page": "341",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "189 Ill. 341"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 103,
    "char_count": 1043,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.577,
    "sha256": "ab05eefced0aedba990ee14a41f72f14abb09015c5cbce3a73194f2e8fd9a88d",
    "simhash": "1:8456a6d9fbd66bda",
    "word_count": 174
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:28:23.462331+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Magic T. Smith et al. v. The City of Chicago."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nA judgment by default confirming a special assessment was entered by the county court of Cook county ag'ainst the property of plaintiffs in error to pay the cost of curbing with combined curb and gutter, and paving with asphalt, Addison avenue and other streets. The error pointed out is, that the ordinance does not sufficiently specify the nature, character and description of the improvement. The description of the combined curb and gutter is defective in precisely the same respects as the ordinance mentioned in Willis v. City of Chicago, {ante, p. 103).\nThe judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.\nReversed and remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William F. Carroll, for plaintiffs in error.",
      "Charles M. Walker, Corporation Counsel, and Denis E. Sullivan, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Magic T. Smith et al. v. The City of Chicago.\nOpinion filed February 20, 1901.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in Willis v. City of Chicago, {ante, p. 103.)\nWrit op Error to the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Orrin 1ST. Carter, Judge, presiding.\nWilliam F. Carroll, for plaintiffs in error.\nCharles M. Walker, Corporation Counsel, and Denis E. Sullivan, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0341-01",
  "first_page_order": 341,
  "last_page_order": 341
}