{
  "id": 441612,
  "name": "The People, ex rel. the Warsaw and Rockford Railroad Company, v. R. W. Rickey",
  "name_abbreviation": "People ex rel. Warsaw & Rockford Railroad v. Rickey",
  "decision_date": "1858-04",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "405",
  "last_page": "405",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "19 Ill. 405"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 46,
    "char_count": 476,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.479,
    "sha256": "596ebed623c5bec3c78022acae6b70e4a4e1c9444efedc8219645820f474bc2d",
    "simhash": "1:151c1ace6ec4f478",
    "word_count": 84
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:41:17.680763+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People, ex rel. the Warsaw and Rockford Railroad Company, v. R. W. Rickey."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAfter notice to the party of an intention to apply to this court for an alternative writ of mandamus, if the writ should be ordered, ten days\u2019 notice, by service of the writ, will be sufficient to compel the party to answer.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People, ex rel. the Warsaw and Rockford Railroad Company, v. R. W. Rickey.\nAfter notice of intention to make application for a mandamus, ten days\u2019 service of the writ is sufficient.\nThis was an application for an alternative mandamus."
  },
  "file_name": "0405-01",
  "first_page_order": 405,
  "last_page_order": 405
}