{
  "id": 441705,
  "name": "Nicholas P. Iglehart, Appellant, v. Lucy D. Barrett, for use of, etc., Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Iglehart v. Barrett",
  "decision_date": "1858-04",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "642",
  "last_page": "642",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "19 Ill. 642"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 55,
    "char_count": 424,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.462,
    "sha256": "1aef7d0ce78d52ef017617aee71bcb1429a03693f9ca9ee49314b874f2040bdc",
    "simhash": "1:09c171761f0527f5",
    "word_count": 68
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:41:17.680763+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Nicholas P. Iglehart, Appellant, v. Lucy D. Barrett, for use of, etc., Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Cat\u00f3n, C. J.\nThis record presents precisely the same question as that decided in Iglehart v. Hobart, ante, 637, differing only in amounts of figures, and for the reason there assigned, the judgment is affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Cat\u00f3n, C. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Arnold, Larned & Lay, for Appellant.",
      "Henry T. Helm, for Appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Nicholas P. Iglehart, Appellant, v. Lucy D. Barrett, for use of, etc., Appellee.\nAPPEAL PROM COOK COUNTY COURT OP COMMON PLEAS.\nArnold, Larned & Lay, for Appellant.\nHenry T. Helm, for Appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0642-01",
  "first_page_order": 642,
  "last_page_order": 642
}