{
  "id": 5579797,
  "name": "The People ex rel. Albert Kocourek v. The City of Chicago and Mandel Bros.",
  "name_abbreviation": "People ex rel. Kocourek v. City of Chicago & Mandel Bros.",
  "decision_date": "1901-12-18",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "593",
  "last_page": "593",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "193 Ill. 593"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 83,
    "char_count": 831,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.568,
    "sha256": "b0778a28035d3ff453bf93f1889e7a4a9420c20a84b1ddc512eef0348af600bf",
    "simhash": "1:19c0fca3ee69f4d0",
    "word_count": 141
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:49:30.831419+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People ex rel. Albert Kocourek v. The City of Chicago and Mandel Bros."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam\nThis case being in all respects like that of People ex rel. v. City of Chicago and Schlesinger & Mayer, (ante, p. 507,) the writ will be denied for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case.\nWrit denied.\nMr. Justice Magruder\nI do not think the writ ought to be denied for reasons stated in Marshall Field and Sehlesinger & Mayer cases, (ante, pp. 525 and 543.)",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam Mr. Justice Magruder"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "L. P. Wilcox, for relator.",
      "Charles H. Walker, Corporation Counsel, for respondent the city of Chicago.",
      "Dupee, Judah, Willard & Wolf, for respondents Handel Bros."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People ex rel. Albert Kocourek v. The City of Chicago and Mandel Bros.\nOpinion filed December 18, 1901.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in People ex rel. v. City of , Chicago and Sehlesinger & Mayer, {ante, p. 507.)\nMageudee, J., dissenting.\nOriginal petition for mandamus.\nL. P. Wilcox, for relator.\nCharles H. Walker, Corporation Counsel, for respondent the city of Chicago.\nDupee, Judah, Willard & Wolf, for respondents Handel Bros."
  },
  "file_name": "0593-01",
  "first_page_order": 593,
  "last_page_order": 593
}