{
  "id": 5580653,
  "name": "Mary F. Carbine et al. v. The Illinois Central Railroad Company",
  "name_abbreviation": "Carbine v. Illinois Central Railroad",
  "decision_date": "1901-12-18",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "81",
  "last_page": "81",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "194 Ill. 81"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "188 Ill. 578",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3233324
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/188/0578-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "188 Ill. 578",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3233324
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/188/0578-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 111,
    "char_count": 1116,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.59,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.16220810556908916
    },
    "sha256": "cb484b0d16603e3b11ebfa5410667e3c0502beff525d912830479447cd1a9c71",
    "simhash": "1:f9f4c00bd668b6f1",
    "word_count": 187
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:49:21.700173+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Mary F. Carbine et al. v. The Illinois Central Railroad Company."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nThis was an action on the case against\nthe appellee for damages alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiffs by the elevation of the tracks of appellee\u2019s railroad adjoining appellants\u2019 said premises, in the city of Chicago.\nThe right of way of the company and the premises of appellants are parts of the same eighty-acre tract, and the facts are in substance the same as were involved in Kotz v. Illinois Central Railroad Co. 188 Ill. 578. The same questions involved here were fully considered and decided in that case. That decision, and the reasons given for it, must control the decision of this case, and the judgment appealed from will therefore be affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Glenn & Schryver, for appellants.",
      "Walker & Payne, John G. Drennan, and Sidney P. Andrews, (J. M. Dickinson, of counsel,) for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Mary F. Carbine et al. v. The Illinois Central Railroad Company.\nOpinion filed December 18, 1901.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in Katz v. Illinois Central Railroad Co. 188 Ill. 578.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. R. S. Tuthill, Judge, presiding.\nGlenn & Schryver, for appellants.\nWalker & Payne, John G. Drennan, and Sidney P. Andrews, (J. M. Dickinson, of counsel,) for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0081-01",
  "first_page_order": 81,
  "last_page_order": 81
}