{
  "id": 5582480,
  "name": "Luke Kalas* v. The People ex rel. C. S. Deneen, State's Attorney",
  "name_abbreviation": "Kalas v. People ex rel. Deneen",
  "decision_date": "1901-12-18",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "156",
  "last_page": "156",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "194 Ill. 156"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 145,
    "char_count": 1469,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.597,
    "sha256": "ad62a4ac2161e70bf934f37f187a29d027208da390c5312873cf5b1ca1ceb215",
    "simhash": "1:307a568103953e92",
    "word_count": 251
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:49:21.700173+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Luke Kalas v. The People ex rel. C. S. Deneen, State\u2019s Attorney."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nIn each of these cases the information\nwas to test the title of the several appellants to the office of inspector of police, charging that in each case the examination held to fill vacancies in those offices was an original examination, \u201cpublic, competitive and free to all citizens of the United States,\u201d and not a promotional examination, as required by the statute and rules of the civil service examination.\nEach of the three defendants filed two pleas, substantially, if not literally, the same as the first and second pleas in the Ptacek case, (ante, p. 125,) there being no claim by either of them that there were not employees in the next lower grade competent and willing to take a promotional examination.\nFor the reasons stated in the Ptacek case the judgment of the Appellate Court will be affirmed in each of said cases.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "James C. McShane, for appellant.",
      "Walker & Payne, and Follett W. Bull, (John Barton Payne, of counsel,) for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Luke Kalas v. The People ex rel. C. S. Deneen, State\u2019s Attorney.\nOpinion filed December 18, 1901\nRehearing denied February 5, 1902.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in Ptacek r. People, ante, p. 125.)\nAppeal from the Appellate Court for the First District; \u2014 heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Murray F. Tuley, Judge, presiding.\nJames C. McShane, for appellant.\nWalker & Payne, and Follett W. Bull, (John Barton Payne, of counsel,) for appellee.\nWith this case are decided No. 2041, Heidelmeler v. People ex rel. and No. 2042, Hartnett v. People ex rel."
  },
  "file_name": "0156-01",
  "first_page_order": 156,
  "last_page_order": 156
}