{
  "id": 5591549,
  "name": "Henry Ericcson v. The City of Chicago",
  "name_abbreviation": "Ericcson v. City of Chicago",
  "decision_date": "1902-12-16",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "395",
  "last_page": "395",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "200 Ill. 395"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 102,
    "char_count": 1191,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.62,
    "sha256": "f6f424ff02cee7de207181cd2f50c1443e321992f11c8962829262fc9d5a8f6e",
    "simhash": "1:a4e529f34e09f648",
    "word_count": 206
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:15:14.408153+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Henry Ericcson v. The City of Chicago."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nThis is a proceeding to condemn lot 36 in block 2 in Central Park second addition to Chicago for school purposes. The trial resulted in a verdict of the jury, finding the compensation to be paid to appellant, as the owner of said lot 36, to be the sum of $2600.00. Judgment was rendered in accordance with the verdict, and the present appeal is prosecuted from such judgment.\nThis case, and the case of Lanquist v. City of Chicago, (ante, p. 69,) are based upon the same record, and the same briefs, and involve the same questions. The present case, therefore, is necessarily disposed of by the views expressed in the case of Lanquist v. City of Chicago, supra. The decision of that case settles the decision of the present case.\nAccordingly, the judgment of the circuit court of Cook county in the present case is affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "George P.'Merrick, for appellant.",
      "Daniel J. McMahon, and Angus Roy Shannon, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Henry Ericcson v. The City of Chicago.\nOpinion filed December 16, 1902.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in Lanquist v. City of Chicago, (ante, p. 69.)\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Frank Baker, Judge, presiding.\nGeorge P.'Merrick, for appellant.\nDaniel J. McMahon, and Angus Roy Shannon, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0395-01",
  "first_page_order": 395,
  "last_page_order": 395
}