{
  "id": 3298539,
  "name": "Michael C. McDonald et al. v. Jesse Holdom, Admr.",
  "name_abbreviation": "McDonald v. Holdom",
  "decision_date": "1904-02-17",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "146",
  "last_page": "147",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "208 Ill. 146"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 119,
    "char_count": 1726,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.604,
    "sha256": "b2ead712120b5c6a2ab4938fa16d7e3255bd8ed3ea82160b13f553d119e2d15a",
    "simhash": "1:45ddf6f1ec59e017",
    "word_count": 298
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:07:50.212646+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Michael C. McDonald et al. v. Jesse Holdom, Admr."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nThis is an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Court for the First District reversing an order of the circuit court of Cook county, remanding the cause and directing a judgment in the lower court.\nThis suit is between the same parties, involves precisely the same questions, was heard in the two\u2019 lower courts on precisely the same proofs and with the same results, as the case of McDonald v. Holdom, (ante, p. 128,) in which a judgment of affirmance has been entered in this court at the present term. The order of the circuit court in that' case directed the satisfaction of a judgment in that court recovered by appellee against appellants on an appeal bond given by appellants upon an appeal from the Appellate Court to this court in earlier litigation between the parties. The order of the circuit court in this case directed the satisfaction of a'judgment in that court, recovered by appellee against appellants on an appeal bond given by appellants upon the appeal from the circuit court to the Appellate Court in the former suit. A full statement of the facts relating to both cases will be found in McDonald v. Holdom, supra. For the reasons assigned in the opinion in that case, the judgment of the Appellate Court under review in this case must be affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Edward Maher, and Robert F. Kolb, for appellants.",
      "Bulkley, Gray & More, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Michael C. McDonald et al. v. Jesse Holdom, Admr.\nOpinion filed February 17, 1904.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in McDonald v. Holdom, (ante, p. 128.)\nAppeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;\u2014heard in that court on writ of error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Elbrjdge Hanecy, Judge, presiding.\nEdward Maher, and Robert F. Kolb, for appellants.\nBulkley, Gray & More, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0146-01",
  "first_page_order": 146,
  "last_page_order": 147
}