{
  "id": 3300337,
  "name": "Roberts Clark, Trustee, v. The City of Chicago",
  "name_abbreviation": "Clark v. City of Chicago",
  "decision_date": "1904-04-20",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "83",
  "last_page": "84",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "209 Ill. 83"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "206 Ill. 557",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5599376
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/206/0557-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "206 Ill. 557",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5599376
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/206/0557-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 140,
    "char_count": 1677,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.595,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.3608438240779088e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6361996394384383
    },
    "sha256": "67f9c0b39eb859699661c3dfb48bd97a87a451be9fae80f033604b91b312770e",
    "simhash": "1:84d7df9104787350",
    "word_count": 284
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:15:21.350466+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Roberts Clark, Trustee, v. The City of Chicago."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nThis appeal is prosecuted from a judgment of the county court of Cook county overruling appellant\u2019s objections and confirming a special assessment against the property of appellant. The only issue was upon the legal objections, and only one of them is involved here.\nIt appears that the record of the first resolution of the board of local improvements in this proceeding refers to the engineer\u2019s estimate in the following language: \u201cThe estimate of the cost of such improvement made by the engineer of the board being $887,000, which said estimate is hereby made a part hereof by reference.\u201d No other mention of the estimate is found in any part of the record, the evidence showing that the estimate was filed in the vault used by the board and was open for inspection. It will thus be seen that the question here presented is upon the same legal objection and identical with the question considered in the case of Kilgallen v. City of Chicago, 206 Ill. 557, wherein it is held that a like objection to the one made in this case should have been sustained. That case is conclusive of the question here presented, and the judgment of the county court will be reversed and the cause remanded.\nReversed and remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Eugene H. Garnett, (Gwynn Garnett, and Joseph H. Pitch, of counsel,) for appellant.",
      "Robert Redfield, and Prank Johnston, Jr., (Edgar Bronson Tolman, Corporation Counsel, of counsel,) for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Roberts Clark, Trustee, v. The City of Chicago.\nOpinion filed April 20, 1904.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in Kilgallen v.City of Chicago, 206 Ill. 557.\nAppeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Orrin N. Carter, Judge, presiding.\nEugene H. Garnett, (Gwynn Garnett, and Joseph H. Pitch, of counsel,) for appellant.\nRobert Redfield, and Prank Johnston, Jr., (Edgar Bronson Tolman, Corporation Counsel, of counsel,) for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0083-01",
  "first_page_order": 83,
  "last_page_order": 84
}