#### Francis W. Dunbar et al. v. The American Telephone and Telegraph Co. et al.

Announced orally December 13, 1904.

Appeals and errors—jurisdiction of Appellate and Supreme Courts cannot be invoked at same time. One who prosecutes an appeal to the Appellate Court from a decree in chancery cannot, while the appeal is pending, invoke the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court by writ of error, notwithstanding he is in doubt as to which court has jurisdiction.

Motion to dismiss writ' of error.

Henry S. Robbins, Pliny B. Smith, and John S. Miller, for plaintiffs in error.

A. N. Waterman, Holt, Wheeler & Sidley, and Tenney, CoEEEEN & Harding, for defendants in error.

Mr. Justice Scott

announced the opinion of the court:

This is a motion made by the defendants in error to dismiss the writ. The plaintiffs in error seek to have reviewed a decree of the circuit court of Cook county. At the time that decree was entered, plaintiffs in error prayed for and obtained an appeal to the Appellate Court for the First District. They filed a bond and are engaged in prosecuting that appeal. This motion was made on the ground that the cause cannot properly be pending in this court and in the Appellate Court at the same time.

It is said, in response to that, that counsel for plaintiffs in error are in doubt as to which of the courts has appellate jurisdiction of this case. We deem that an insufficient answer. They prosecuted an appeal to the Appellate Court, and so long as that is pending they will not be permitted to invoke the jurisdiction of this court. Accordingly, the writ will be dismissed.

Writ dismissed.