{
  "id": 5282709,
  "name": "Joseph Einstein, Appellant, v. The City of Joliet, Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Einstein v. City of Joliet",
  "decision_date": "1859-04",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "126",
  "last_page": "126",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "22 Ill. 126"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 63,
    "char_count": 606,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.575,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.380125665320789e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3928630588115369
    },
    "sha256": "b4cbd0bae7bd482b8b05b670b53121b76d104653fe8f479f18b00278eec4a17c",
    "simhash": "1:9bedf093ca7b8dd2",
    "word_count": 105
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:18:21.625654+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Joseph Einstein, Appellant, v. The City of Joliet, Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Walker, J.\nThe record in this case presents the same questions as those determined in the case of Brown v. The City of Joliet, ante, 123, at the present term of this court. We therefore regard it unnecessary to discuss them again, in this case.\nThe judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed and the cause remanded.\nJudgment reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Walker, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Joseph Einstein, Appellant, v. The City of Joliet, Appellee.\nAPPEAL FROM WILL.\nThis case, with the exception of the names of the parties, is precisely like that preceding it; and therefore it is not necessary to give anything more than the following opinion of the court:"
  },
  "file_name": "0126-01",
  "first_page_order": 128,
  "last_page_order": 128
}