{
  "id": 5281297,
  "name": "Benjamin B. Reynolds et al., Appellants, v. Charles Paver, Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Reynolds v. Paver",
  "decision_date": "1859-04",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "660",
  "last_page": "660",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "22 Ill. 660"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 56,
    "char_count": 458,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.562,
    "sha256": "67f73a5e3de42d6e7dcdd37306745a415cc30d9b43c1907423592078bef7762c",
    "simhash": "1:80873659105f3dd1",
    "word_count": 80
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:18:21.625654+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Benjamin B. Reynolds et al., Appellants, v. Charles Paver, Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Cat\u00f3n, C. J.\nPrecisely the same question arises in this case which is decided in the case of Fleming v. Jencks, ante, 475, and it must be decided in the same way. The order overruling the motion must be reversed, and the cause remanded, with the same directions as in that case.\nJudgment reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Cat\u00f3n, C. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "T. L. Dickey, for Appellants.",
      "B. C. Cook, for Appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Benjamin B. Reynolds et al., Appellants, v. Charles Paver, Appellee.\nAPPEAL EROM LA SALLE COUNTY COURT.\nT. L. Dickey, for Appellants.\nB. C. Cook, for Appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0660-01",
  "first_page_order": 662,
  "last_page_order": 662
}