{
  "id": 5281110,
  "name": "Reuben Coon, Plaintiff in Error, v. Mason County, Defendant in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Coon v. Mason County",
  "decision_date": "1859-04",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "666",
  "last_page": "666",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "22 Ill. 666"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 110,
    "char_count": 1267,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.582,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.703104500168488e-07,
      "percentile": 0.9496806570576123
    },
    "sha256": "c3018d394b8f953873a0efd47fdd402717371891af6aca0700de9653863240c4",
    "simhash": "1:0f61ae35e5fdd854",
    "word_count": 224
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:18:21.625654+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Reuben Coon, Plaintiff in Error, v. Mason County, Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis proceeding was under the thirty-eighth section of the chapter entitled \u201c Roads,\u201d (Rev. Laws, 1845, Sec. 38,) which provides that the decision of the Circuit Court shall be final. We are of the opinion that the legislature intended to prohibit the prosecution of a writ of error as well as an appeal.\nThe point made on this motion, was not considered by this court, in the cases of Hutchins v. De Witt County, 1 Gilm. R. 345, and The County of Sangamon v. Brown et al., 13 Ill. R. 207.\nThe motion is sustained.\nMotion sustained.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "James Roberts, for Plaintiff in Erior.",
      "Lyman Lacey, and Goudy & Waite, for Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Reuben Coon, Plaintiff in Error, v. Mason County, Defendant in Error.\nERROR TO MASON.\nThe decision of the Circuit Court under the 38tli section of the Road Law in the Revised Statutes, is final.\nThe County Court of Mason county ordered a' road to be opened, and refused to allow the plaintiff in error any damages for crossing his land; from that decisio\u00f1 he appealed to the Circuit Court, which affirmed the order of the County Court. The plaintiff in error then prosecuted his writ pi error in this court.\nThe defendant in error moved to dismiss the cause from this court because the decision of the Circuit Court was final.\nJames Roberts, for Plaintiff in Erior.\nLyman Lacey, and Goudy & Waite, for Defendant in Error."
  },
  "file_name": "0666-01",
  "first_page_order": 668,
  "last_page_order": 668
}