{
  "id": 3346370,
  "name": "Philip Mischler et al. v. The Mutual Reserve Fund Life Association",
  "name_abbreviation": "Mischler v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n",
  "decision_date": "1906-02-21",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "451",
  "last_page": "451",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "220 Ill. 451"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 103,
    "char_count": 1095,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.75,
    "sha256": "5371a5d0bc4273b653b3a0dbfc26fd0378b1707dbe583a53fe0dff91fa986a8f",
    "simhash": "1:5862788878308c90",
    "word_count": 182
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:19:12.359650+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Philip Mischler et al. v. The Mutual Reserve Fund Life Association."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam :\nIn this case judgment was rendered by the court below in favor of appellee and against appellants for $420.10, being the amount found to be due upon a certificate of insurance issued to Philip Mischler on June 7, 1879, by the Covenant Mutual Benefit Association, for $2500. All of the questions involved in this case are considered and determined in the case of Bolles v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass. (ante, p. 400,) and in accordance with the views therein expressed the judgment of the Appellate Court is reversed and that of the circuit court affirmed.\nJudgment reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "A. G. Murray, for appellants.",
      "Kerrick & Bracken, (George Burnham, Jr., of counsel,) for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Philip Mischler et al. v. The Mutual Reserve Fund Life Association.\nOpinion filed February 21, 1906\nRehearing denied April 5, 1906.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in Bolles v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass. (ante, p. 400.)\nAppeal from the Appellate Court for the Third District ;\u2014heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Sangamon county; the Hon. James A. Creighton, Judge, presiding.\nA. G. Murray, for appellants.\nKerrick & Bracken, (George Burnham, Jr., of counsel,) for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0451-01",
  "first_page_order": 451,
  "last_page_order": 451
}