{
  "id": 3343726,
  "name": "Esther D. Hart v. The Sangamon River Drainage District",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hart v. Sangamon River Drainage District",
  "decision_date": "1906-04-17",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "427",
  "last_page": "427",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "221 Ill. 427"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "219 Ill. 454",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5621937
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/219/0454-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "219 Ill. 454",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5621937
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/219/0454-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 93,
    "char_count": 1016,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.724,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.093757782789653
    },
    "sha256": "ee2e13a9b08d8e265e602c623d8af54269bd72345d75ffa0e133d6ecc4454b59",
    "simhash": "1:46164cb59a701f5a",
    "word_count": 163
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:45:28.412278+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Esther D. Hart v. The Sangamon River Drainage District."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam :\nThis case is before us on appeal from the orders of the county court of McLean county organizing the Sangamon River Drainage District, and confirming an assessment of benefits spread by the commissioners of that district. The proceeding was under the Drainage act of 1879, and the amendments thereto, commonly known as the \u201cLevee act.\u201d All the questions involved which are entitled to serious consideration are identical with those disposed of in Hull v. Sangamon River Drainage District, 219 Ill. 454, and it is unnecessary to re-state the views of this court on these questions.\nThe judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.\nReversed and remanded. .",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Hart & Fleming, for appellant.",
      "Wight & Alexander, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Esther D. Hart v. The Sangamon River Drainage District.\nOpinion filed April 17, 1906.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in Hull v. Sangamon River Drainage District, 219 Ill. 454.\nAppeal from the County Court of McLean county; the Hon. Rolland A. Russell, Judge, presiding.\nHart & Fleming, for appellant.\nWight & Alexander, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0427-01",
  "first_page_order": 427,
  "last_page_order": 427
}