#### John W. Pulliam et al., Appellants, v. Charles Pencenneau, Appellee.

APPEAL FROM ST. CLAIR.

In an action of debt, the verdict and judgment should show the amount of debt and damages, or, if the amount is all debt, it should so appear.

*94This was an action of debt commenced by appellee against appellants, and tried at the September term, 1859, of the St. Clair Circuit Court, Snyder, Judge, presiding.

The plaintiff below sued in debt, claiming debt $1,000, damage $1,500. Declaration in the usual form on a penal bond, dated 10th September, 1858, alleged to be given by defendants below to plaintiff below, with $1,000 penalty, conditioned that if defendants below should convey to plaintiff below within six months 320 acres of land, of same value as the north half of Sec. 31, T. 8 S., R. 3 W., in Jackson county, Illinois, which the said plaintiff below had furnished to defendants below, then the bond to be void.

Underwoods, for Appellants.

J. B. Hay, for Appellee.

Walker, J.

This was an action of debt on a penal bond for one thousand dollars, conditioned for the conveyance of certain real estate, within six months from its date. The jury found a verdict for the gross sum of $744.30 in favor of plaintiff. It does not, by its terms or otherwise, find that any portion of the sum thus found is either debt or damages. The defendant entered a motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial, which was overruled, and judgment entered upon the verdict, from which defendant appeals to this court.

The verdict and judgment should have found the amount of debt, and the amount of damages, or if the amount found was all debt, it should have so found the fact. This verdict and the judgment upon it fails to do either, and it is therefore erroneous, and must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.