{
  "id": 5640739,
  "name": "James S. Wight, Receiver, Appellant, vs. The City of Chicago, Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wight v. City of Chicago",
  "decision_date": "1908-04-23",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "83",
  "last_page": "83",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "234 Ill. 83"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "231 Ill. 61",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5636110
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/231/0061-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 129,
    "char_count": 1476,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.739,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.682524327565528e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4530144421547357
    },
    "sha256": "f68c3613c4fad52a42fb541f9f659bdbb76113a1718ab26508767b2222bdc06d",
    "simhash": "1:518bb08f442d4ddc",
    "word_count": 252
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:59:09.185837+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "James S. Wight, Receiver, Appellant, vs. The City of Chicago, Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Dunn\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThis case was tried by the court, by agreement, without a jury, upon a stipulation as to the facts. There was no ruling of the court upon the admission or exclusion of evidence and no written propositions to be held as law were submitted to the court in accordance with the provisions of the Practice act, therefore no question of law is presented by the record for our consideration. Jacobson v. Liverpool and London and Globe Ins. Co. 231 Ill. 61; Swain v. First Nat. Bank, 201 id. 416; Grabbs v. City of Danville, 166 id. 441; Bolton v. Johnston, 163 id. 234.\nThe judgment of the Appellate Court is affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Dunn"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Frederick A. Brown, for appellant.",
      "Howard W. Hayes, and George W. Miller, (Edward J. Brundage, Corporation Counsel, of counsel,) for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "James S. Wight, Receiver, Appellant, vs. The City of Chicago, Appellee.\nOpinion filed April 23, 1908.\nAppeals and Errors\u2014when no question is presented for the Supreme Court. No question is presented for the Supreme Court\u2019s consideration upon appeal from the Appellate Court in a case at law heard in the trial court, by agreement, without a jury, upon stipulated facts, where there were no rulings of the court upon the evidence and no propositions of law were submitted.\nAppeal from the Branch Appellate Court for the First District;\u2014heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. George A. Dupuy, Judge, presiding.\nFrederick A. Brown, for appellant.\nHoward W. Hayes, and George W. Miller, (Edward J. Brundage, Corporation Counsel, of counsel,) for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0083-01",
  "first_page_order": 83,
  "last_page_order": 83
}