{
  "id": 8500089,
  "name": "Carvin R. Favorite et al. Plaintiffs in Error, vs. Board of Education of Chicago, Defendant in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Favorite v. Board of Education",
  "decision_date": "1908-06-18",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "314",
  "last_page": "314",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "235 Ill. 314"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "233 Ill. 464",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3380128
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/233/0464-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "233 Ill. 464",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3380128
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/233/0464-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 103,
    "char_count": 1488,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.637,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.2533959344427176e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6107170726941995
    },
    "sha256": "b401008659d1ab22d75102b2737a66b36c7b547a4f7c1017a84a2354b5fc12e2",
    "simhash": "1:c9f7676fef1c8e54",
    "word_count": 261
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:15:07.814058+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Carvin R. Favorite et al. Plaintiffs in Error, vs. Board of Education of Chicago, Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam :\nThis was a bill in chancery filed by the plaintiffs in error in the circuit court of Cook county to enjoin the defendant in error from enforcing a rule adopted by the defendant in error known as the \u201canti-fraternity rule.\u201d A demurrer was interposed to the bill and sustained and the bill dismissed for want of equity. The decree of the circuit court was affirmed by the Appellate Court for the First District, and this writ of error has been sued .out from this court to the Appellate Court to review the judgment of that court in affirming the decree of the circuit court.\nThe questions raised upon this record are identical with those raised in the case of Wilson v. Board of Education of Chicago, 233 Ill. 464, and the decision in that case is decisive of this case. In accordance, therefore, with the holding of this court in that case, the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the decree of the circuit court will be affirmed.\nT , . , Judgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Stuart G. Shepard, for plaintiffs in error.",
      "Frank Hamfin, and Angus Roy Shannon, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Carvin R. Favorite et al. Plaintiffs in Error, vs. Board of Education of Chicago, Defendant in Error.\nOpinion filed June 18, 1908.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in Wilson v. Board of Education, 233 Ill. 464.\nWrit of Error to the Branch Appellate Court for the First District; \u2014 heard in that court on writ of error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Lockwood HonorF, Judge, presiding.\nStuart G. Shepard, for plaintiffs in error.\nFrank Hamfin, and Angus Roy Shannon, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0314-01",
  "first_page_order": 314,
  "last_page_order": 314
}