{
  "id": 5285302,
  "name": "The Road Commissioners of the Town of Vermillion, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Asa Holdridge, Defendant in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Road Commissioners of Vermillion v. Holdridge",
  "decision_date": "1860-04",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "119",
  "last_page": "119",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "24 Ill. 119"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 58,
    "char_count": 541,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.561,
    "sha256": "b8ec9e2df43d561f7f638c6b458ba7e1395074934094607ac33e38c79aca9d4e",
    "simhash": "1:7ef957f1dd4f5f92",
    "word_count": 91
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:23:31.160386+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The Road Commissioners of the Town of Vermillion, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Asa Holdridge, Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Walker, J.\nThe facts presented by this record involve the same legal propositions raised and determined by the case, McPherson v. Holdridge, determined at the present term of this court. It is therefore unnecessary to discuss them here, that case being decisive of this.\nThe same judgment is rendered in this case as in that.\nDecree modified.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Walker, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The Road Commissioners of the Town of Vermillion, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Asa Holdridge, Defendant in Error.\nERROR TO LA SALLE.\nThis case is in all respects similar to that published ante, page 38."
  },
  "file_name": "0119-01",
  "first_page_order": 111,
  "last_page_order": 111
}