{
  "id": 5285222,
  "name": "Robert S. Brush, Appellant, v. Francis Seguin, and James Byrns, Appellees",
  "name_abbreviation": "Brush v. Seguin",
  "decision_date": "1860-04",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "257",
  "last_page": "257",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "24 Ill. 257"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 48,
    "char_count": 434,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.564,
    "sha256": "22ae4510c3ea5ec887bfdfe6623ebe1d79674664baaddddb1c1485f1928cac64",
    "simhash": "1:080109130264a059",
    "word_count": 70
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:23:31.160386+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Robert S. Brush, Appellant, v. Francis Seguin, and James Byrns, Appellees."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Walker, J.\nThe material facts contained in this record, and the questions presented, are the same as those in the case of Brush v. Seguin et al., ante. The decision of that case therefore disposes of this, and renders the further discussion of these questions unnecessary.\nThe judgment of the court below is affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Walker, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Robert S. Brush, Appellant, v. Francis Seguin, and James Byrns, Appellees.\nAPPEAL FROM KANKAKEE."
  },
  "file_name": "0257-01",
  "first_page_order": 249,
  "last_page_order": 249
}