{
  "id": 3410910,
  "name": "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, vs. The Bowes-Allegretti Company et al. Plaintiffs in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Bowes-Allegretti Co.",
  "decision_date": "1910-04-21",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "557",
  "last_page": "557",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "244 Ill. 557"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 93,
    "char_count": 931,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.681,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.5828155114230504e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2874350975674644
    },
    "sha256": "cbb7b77f18b75416e4cacec198151739c85bcda81702dcb7a359de92bbfcb3b0",
    "simhash": "1:7cf97b89609aaeb9",
    "word_count": 155
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:35:36.770321+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, vs. The Bowes-Allegretti Company et al. Plaintiffs in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam :\nThe constitutionality of the act of 1909, generally known as the Woman\u2019s Ten Hour law, is involved in this case, as it is' in Ritchie & Co. v. Wayman, (ante, p. 509,) where said act is held to be constitutional. In accordance with the views expressed in the opinion filed in that case, the judgment of the municipal court of Chicago will be affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.\nMr. Justice Vickers, dissenting.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Haynie &' Lust, (William Duee Haynie, of counsel,) for plaintiffs in error.",
      "W. H. Stead, Attorney General, and John E. W. Way-man, State\u2019s Attorney, for the People."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, vs. The Bowes-Allegretti Company et al. Plaintiffs in Error.\nOpinion filed April 21, 1910.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in Ritchie & Co. v. Wayman, (ante, p. 509.)\nVickers, J., dissenting.\nWrit oe Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Judson F. Going, Judge, presiding.\nHaynie &' Lust, (William Duee Haynie, of counsel,) for plaintiffs in error.\nW. H. Stead, Attorney General, and John E. W. Way-man, State\u2019s Attorney, for the People."
  },
  "file_name": "0557-01",
  "first_page_order": 557,
  "last_page_order": 557
}
