{
  "id": 443657,
  "name": "The Columbus Machine Manufacturing Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Phares A. Dorwin et al., Defendants in Error; The Same v. Edward R. Ulrich et al., Defendants in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Columbus Machine Manufacturing Co. v. Dorwin",
  "decision_date": "1860-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "169",
  "last_page": "169",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "25 Ill. 169"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 81,
    "char_count": 894,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.573,
    "sha256": "1b637d6200bfb2b3ab2c180919358cab258697097a27a539d1baca9430ffd252",
    "simhash": "1:ee6af4bb0d4acd23",
    "word_count": 150
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:06:49.902665+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The Columbus Machine Manufacturing Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Phares A. Dorwin et al., Defendants in Error. The Same v. Edward R. Ulrich et al., Defendants in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Caton, C. J.\nThe petitions in both these cases present the same defect which we have so often decided to be fatal. They state no time within which the contracts were to be performed, as is required by the statute. This may be remedied by amendments, after the cases are remanded.\nThe decrees are reversed, and the suits remanded.\nDecrees reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Caton, C. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Lincoln & Herndon, for Plaintiffs in Error.",
      "J. C. Conceding, for Defendants in Error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The Columbus Machine Manufacturing Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Phares A. Dorwin et al., Defendants in Error. The Same v. Edward R. Ulrich et al., Defendants in Error.\nERROR TO SANGAMON.\nThe petition to enforce a mechanics\u2019 lien must state a time within which the contract was to be performed.\nThese were proceedings in the court below to enforce a mechanics\u2019 lien. The plaintiffs in error are incumbrancers, and were made parties defendants below.\nLincoln & Herndon, for Plaintiffs in Error.\nJ. C. Conceding, for Defendants in Error."
  },
  "file_name": "0169-01",
  "first_page_order": 175,
  "last_page_order": 175
}