{
  "id": 443677,
  "name": "James Scott et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Harden Keeling, Defendant in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Scott v. Keeling",
  "decision_date": "1861-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "358",
  "last_page": "358",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "25 Ill. 358"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 67,
    "char_count": 722,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.633,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.7786216498625334e-07,
      "percentile": 0.8349633511451826
    },
    "sha256": "c23bc75420d49a4c6039be7bdfe68716ce3e7b8e438a57ffdb0fba0389ddd5b4",
    "simhash": "1:3560148553e8217a",
    "word_count": 125
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:06:49.902665+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "James Scott et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Harden Keeling, Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per curiam.\nThe petition in this case is insufficient. Both the petition and proof show that no time was specified by the contract within which it should be performed.\nThe decree must be reversed, and the suit remanded.\nDecree reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Judd, Boyd & James, for Plaintiffs in Error.",
      "W. H. Herndon, for Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "James Scott et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Harden Keeling, Defendant in Error.\nERROR TO FULTON.\nA petition for a mechanics\u2019 lien is insufficient, if it does not show that a time was specified within which the contract was to be performed.\nThis was a proceeding in the Fulton Circuit Court, under the statute to enforce a mechanics\u2019 lien. The facts of-the case are stated in the opinion of the court.\nJudd, Boyd & James, for Plaintiffs in Error.\nW. H. Herndon, for Defendant in Error."
  },
  "file_name": "0358-01",
  "first_page_order": 364,
  "last_page_order": 364
}