{ "id": 4700334, "name": "H. H. Kohlsaat & Co., Appellee, vs. William L. O'Connell, County Treasurer, Appellant", "name_abbreviation": "H. H. Kohlsaat & Co. v. O'Connell", "decision_date": "1912-10-26", "docket_number": "", "first_page": "271", "last_page": "273", "citations": [ { "type": "official", "cite": "255 Ill. 271" } ], "court": { "name_abbreviation": "Ill.", "id": 8772, "name": "Illinois Supreme Court" }, "jurisdiction": { "id": 29, "name_long": "Illinois", "name": "Ill." }, "cites_to": [ { "cite": "95 Fed. Rep. 271", "category": "reporters:federal", "reporter": "F.", "case_ids": [ 8287789 ], "opinion_index": 0, "case_paths": [ "/f/95/0271-01" ] }, { "cite": "118 N. C. 83", "category": "reporters:state", "reporter": "N.C.", "case_ids": [ 8652570 ], "opinion_index": 0, "case_paths": [ "/nc/118/0083-01" ] }, { "cite": "108 La. 603", "category": "reporters:state", "reporter": "La.", "case_ids": [ 2493055 ], "opinion_index": 0, "case_paths": [ "/la/108/0603-01" ] }, { "cite": "171 U. S. 210", "category": "reporters:federal", "reporter": "U.S.", "case_ids": [ 3601087 ], "opinion_index": 0, "case_paths": [ "/us/171/0210-01" ] }, { "cite": "238 Ill. 137", "category": "reporters:state", "reporter": "Ill.", "case_ids": [ 3427035 ], "opinion_index": 0, "case_paths": [ "/ill/238/0137-01" ] }, { "cite": "251 Ill. 260", "category": "reporters:state", "reporter": "Ill.", "case_ids": [ 3435069 ], "opinion_index": 0, "case_paths": [ "/ill/251/0260-01" ] } ], "analysis": { "cardinality": 373, "char_count": 5410, "ocr_confidence": 0.78, "pagerank": { "raw": 2.950045005294771e-07, "percentile": 0.8487865508761322 }, "sha256": "a53a1d8139ce0c75ecff7e4a070b28e3684779cfa34307d89e509188094f7618", "simhash": "1:55c0cfbcc2ab5293", "word_count": 882 }, "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:18:54.588983+00:00", "provenance": { "date_added": "2019-08-29", "source": "Harvard", "batch": "2018" }, "casebody": { "judges": [], "parties": [ "H. H. Kohlsaat & Co., Appellee, vs. William L. O\u2019Connell, County Treasurer, Appellant." ], "opinions": [ { "text": "Mr. Justice Carter\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nAppellee is a corporation organized under the laws of this State to \u201cmanufacture and sell, at wholesale and retail, bakers\u2019 goods and restaurant supplies.\u201d Its principal office is in Chicago, where its tangible property was assessed for the year 1911 by the local assessors. The same year -\"the State Board of Equalization assessed its capital stock and franchise in excess of the valuation of such tangible property. This bill was filed in the superior court of Cook county to restrain the collection of the tax fixed by the State board on the ground that said board was without jurisdiction to impose it. To this bill a general demurrer was filed and overruled. Appellant electing to stand by its demurrer, a decree was entered perpetually enjoining the collection of such tax. This is an appeal from that decree.\nCounsel for appellant contend that under its charter appellee was not organized for \u201cmanufacturing purposes,\u201d because bakers\u2019 goods and restaurant, supplies are not, in the ordinary sense of the term, manufactured articles, and that it is not a \u201cmercantile\u201d corporation, because it only sells goods manufactured by itself. Both parties concede that if it was organized for either purpose or both purposes the decree was properly entered, (Miller, Watt & Co. v. O'Connell, 251 Ill. 260,) and that the purpose for which a corporation is organized must be determined from its charter. (People v. Ravenswood Hospital, 238 Ill. 137.) The bill alleges the purpose of the charter as set out above, and further alleges that the appellee is now engaged in the business it was authorized to carry on by its charter, and none other.\nOne of the definitions of \u201cmanufacture,\u201d as given in the Century Dictionary, is, \u201cto make or fabricate, as anything for use, especially in considerable quantities or numbers or by the aid of many hands or of machinery.\u201d One of the definitions in Webster\u2019s New International Dictionary is, \u201cto make (wares or other products) by hand, by machinery or by other agency.\u201d In Tide-Water Oil Co. v. United States, 171 U. S. 210, the court says (p. 216) : \u201cThe primary meaning of the word \u2018manufacture\u2019 is something made by hand as distinguished from a natural growth, but as machinery has largely supplanted this primitive method the word is now ordinarily used to denote an article upon the material of which labor has been expended to make the finished product. \u2022 Ordinarily, the article so manufactured takes a different form or at least subserves a different purpose from the original materials and usually it is given a different name. Raw materials may be, and often are, subjected to successive processes of manufacture, each one of which is complete in itself but several of which may be required to make the final product. Thus, logs are first manufactured into boards, planks, joists, scantlings, etc., and then by entirely different processes are fashioned into boxes, furniture, doors, window sashes, trimmings, and the thousand and one articles manufactured wholly or in part of w'ood. The steel spring of a watch is made ultimately from iron ore but by a large number of processes or transformations, each successive step in which is a distinct process of manufacture and for which the article so manufactured receives a different name.\u201d In State v. Sugar Refining Co. 108 La. 603, it was held that a refiner of sugar was a manufacturer, the authorities and definitions being reviewed at length. We are of the opinion that the making of bakers\u2019 goods and restaurant supplies is properly termed \u201cmanufacturing.\u201d\nWebster\u2019s New International Dictionary gives as one of the definitions of \u201cmercantile,\u201d \u201chaving to do with, or engaged in, trade, or the buying and selling of commodities.\u201d The Standard Dictionary defines \u201cmerchandise\u201d as \u201canything movable, customarily \u25a0 bought and sold for profit.\u201d In Rosenbaum v. City of Newbern, 118 N. C. 83, the court held that \u201cthe term \u2018merchant\u2019 embraces all who buy and sell any species of movable goods for gain or profit.\u201d (See to the same effect, In re San Gabriel Sanitorium Co. 95 Fed. Rep. 271, and cases cited; 5 Wordand Phrases, 4477, 4482, and cases cited; 20 Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law,\u2014-2d ed.\u2014580, and notes; 27 . Cyc. 471.) There is nothing in the definition of a \u201cmercantile\u201d corporation which requires that it shall sell goods manufactured by others than itself. Manifestly, this corporation must be held to be one organized for manufacturing and mercantile purposes, as those terms are used in our revenue statute.\nThe decree of the superior court must be affirmed.\nDecree affirmed.", "type": "majority", "author": "Mr. Justice Carter" } ], "attorneys": [ "Francis S. Wilson, County Attorney, and William F. Struckmann, for appellant.", "Mayer, Meyer, Austrian & Platt, for appellee." ], "corrections": "", "head_matter": "H. H. Kohlsaat & Co., Appellee, vs. William L. O\u2019Connell, County Treasurer, Appellant.\nOpinion filed October 26, 1912.\nTaxes\u2014corporation organised to manufacture and sell bakei-s\u2019 goods is a manufacturing and mercantile corporation. A corporation organized to. \u201cmanufacture and sell, at wholesale and retail, bakers\u2019 goods and restaurant supplies,\u201d is a manufacturing and mercantile corporation within the meaning of the Revenue law, and the capital stock of such corporation must be assessed by the local assessor and not by the State Board of Equalization.\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Richard E. Burice, Judge, presiding.\nFrancis S. Wilson, County Attorney, and William F. Struckmann, for appellant.\nMayer, Meyer, Austrian & Platt, for appellee." }, "file_name": "0271-01", "first_page_order": 271, "last_page_order": 273 }