{
  "id": 4713565,
  "name": "The People ex rel. George P. Heikes, County Collector, Appellee, vs. The Cincinnati, Lafayette and Chicago Railway Company, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "People ex rel. Heikes v. Cincinnati, Lafayette & Chicago Railway Co.",
  "decision_date": "1912-12-17",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "478",
  "last_page": "478",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "256 Ill. 478"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 126,
    "char_count": 1469,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.755,
    "sha256": "7c66e54a5c0a51c21e530121c1b3831fa20a96d27c6729eca42a032c4d5d5f3e",
    "simhash": "1:5cbce64602002e41",
    "word_count": 235
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:24:00.731799+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People ex rel. George P. Heikes, County Collector, Appellee, vs. The Cincinnati, Lafayette and Chicago Railway Company, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam :\nThis is an application by the county collector of Iroquois county for a judgment against the land of appellant for delinquent road and bridge taxes levied by the highway commissioners of Beaver township, in Iroquois county. The objection was overruled in the county court, and this appeal was taken.\nThe highway commissioners of said town levied thirty-six cents on each $100 under section 13 of the Road and Bridge act, and certified to the board of town auditors and assessor an additional levy for twenty-five cents on each $100 under section 14 of said law, giving as \u201cthe reason therefor,\u201d \u201cbuilding roads.\u201d This record, on the question involved, is identical with that in People v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Co. (ante, p. 446.) Under that decision the objections were properly overruled.\nThe judgment of the county court will be affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Free P. Morris, Eugene P. Morris, and R. C. South, (GlEnnon, Cary, Walker & Howe, of counsel,) for appellant.",
      "John P. Pallissard, State\u2019s Attorney, and Saum & Malo, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People ex rel. George P. Heikes, County Collector, Appellee, vs. The Cincinnati, Lafayette and Chicago Railway Company, Appellant.\nOpinion filed December 17, 1912.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in People v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Co. (ante, p. 446.)\nAppeal from the County Court of Iroquois county; the Hon. John H. Gillan, Judge, presiding.\nFree P. Morris, Eugene P. Morris, and R. C. South, (GlEnnon, Cary, Walker & Howe, of counsel,) for appellant.\nJohn P. Pallissard, State\u2019s Attorney, and Saum & Malo, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0478-01",
  "first_page_order": 480,
  "last_page_order": 480
}