{
  "id": 4740735,
  "name": "Nina Thomasson et al. Appellants, vs. The City of Chicago, Appellee; Sarah Lillian Phelps, Admx., Appellant, vs. The City of Chicago, Appellee; Harry S. Mecartney, Appellant, vs. The City of Chicago, Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Thomasson v. City of Chicago",
  "decision_date": "1913-12-17",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "131",
  "last_page": "131",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "261 Ill. 131"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "259 Ill. 322",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        4727913
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/259/0322-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "259 Ill. 322",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        4727913
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/259/0322-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 112,
    "char_count": 1264,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.689,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.7189078829503834e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3587850102457711
    },
    "sha256": "4e07dfcff60d918ee4e18e97bcffa8caecc04fe1e1c80afe20d60dc56f44af19",
    "simhash": "1:017bf5a3c63dced8",
    "word_count": 208
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:07:32.535012+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Nina Thomasson et al. Appellants, vs. The City of Chicago, Appellee.\u2014Sarah Lillian Phelps, Admx., Appellant, vs. The City of Chicago, Appellee.\u2014Harry S. Mecartney, Appellant, vs. The City of Chicago, Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Carter\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThese three cases were consolidated in this court and heard as one case. Each of them came to this court by appeal .on a certificate of importance from the Appellate Court. The record in this consolidated case is in all essential particulars the same as that in City of Chicago v. Thomasson, 259 Ill. 322. The questions raised are identical with those raised in the case just cited. The decision in that case must control here.\nThe judgment of the Appellate Court must therefore be affirmed in each case.\nJudgments affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Carter"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Richard W. Ceifford, and Enoch J. Price, for appellants.",
      "Phieip J. McKenna, and Howard F. Bishop, (Wie-Eiam H. Sexton, Corporation Counsel, of counsel,) for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Nina Thomasson et al. Appellants, vs. The City of Chicago, Appellee.\u2014Sarah Lillian Phelps, Admx., Appellant, vs. The City of Chicago, Appellee.\u2014Harry S. Mecartney, Appellant, vs. The City of Chicago, Appellee.\nOpinion filed December 17, 1913.\nThis consolidated case is controlled by the decision in City of Chicago v. Thomasson, 259 Ill. 322.\nAppEae from the Appellate Court for the First District ; \u2014 -heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Jesse A. Baedwin, Judge, presiding.\nRichard W. Ceifford, and Enoch J. Price, for appellants.\nPhieip J. McKenna, and Howard F. Bishop, (Wie-Eiam H. Sexton, Corporation Counsel, of counsel,) for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0131-01",
  "first_page_order": 131,
  "last_page_order": 131
}