{
  "id": 4786433,
  "name": "The People ex rel. Robert Hewitt, County Collector, Appellee, vs. The Chicago and Eastern Illinois Railroad Company, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "People ex rel. Hewitt v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad",
  "decision_date": "1914-12-16",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "69",
  "last_page": "69",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "266 Ill. 69"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "265 Ill. 528",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        4780430
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/265/0528-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "265 Ill. 528",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        4780430
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/265/0528-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 99,
    "char_count": 1054,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.742,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15359003555805764
    },
    "sha256": "43e7f36d8bbd630198186302b357320a559f5e05fc3d9929018b520b1496f606",
    "simhash": "1:330616c12275ea59",
    "word_count": 183
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:58:08.774336+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People ex rel. Robert Hewitt, County Collector, Appellee, vs. The Chicago and Eastern Illinois Railroad Company, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam :\nThe two questions raised in this case are the same as those presented and decided in People v. Chicago, Indiana and Southern Railroad Co. 265 Ill. 528, and the briefs in the two cases are identical. For the reasons given in that case the judgment of the comity court is affirmed in so far as it affects the State aid road tax and reversed as to the district road tax of the town of Norton, and the cause is remanded to the county court, with directions to sustain the objections to the district road tax of the town of Norton.\nReversed in part and remanded, with directions.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "W. R. Hunter, (Homer T. Dick, of counsel,) for appellant.",
      "Wayne H. DyEr, State\u2019s Attorney, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People ex rel. Robert Hewitt, County Collector, Appellee, vs. The Chicago and Eastern Illinois Railroad Company, Appellant.\nOpinion filed December 16, 1914.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in People v. Chicago, Indiana and Southern Railroad Co. 265 Ill. 528.\nAppeal from the County Court of Kankakee county; the Hon. A. W. Deselm, Judge, presiding.\nW. R. Hunter, (Homer T. Dick, of counsel,) for appellant.\nWayne H. DyEr, State\u2019s Attorney, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0069-01",
  "first_page_order": 69,
  "last_page_order": 69
}