{
  "id": 2404198,
  "name": "The People ex rel. Harry R. Smith, County Collector, Appellee, vs. M. Matkovitch, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "People ex rel. Smith v. Matkovitch",
  "decision_date": "1915-02-17",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "215",
  "last_page": "216",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "267 Ill. 215"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 143,
    "char_count": 2082,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.835,
    "sha256": "df5acd4f3bb424ca425099d86c72f3d18fbcdd8d552f4c1e104275ab7db56f9f",
    "simhash": "1:8ede0a3a00eddf56",
    "word_count": 361
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:20:31.127866+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People ex rel. Harry R. Smith, County Collector, Appellee, vs. M. Matkovitch, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam :\nThis is an appeal from the judgment of the county court of Bureau county overruling objections of appellant to a special tax levied for the construction of a sidewalk along appellant\u2019s property in the city of Spring Valley. The special tax purports to have been levifed under a special ordinance passed by the city council pursuant to the provisions of the so-called Special Sidewalk act. The ordinance providing for the construction of the sidewalk does not fix the grade line of the'walk but refers to a general ordinance of the city, and states the sidewalk shall be constructed in the manner therein specified.; The general ordinance introduced in evidence does not fix the grade line of the sidewalk or of the street or refer to any other ordinance which does fix the grade line, and no proof was introduced on the trial showing the grade of the sidewalk or street had ever been fixed by any proper ordinance of the city.\nThe record in this case and the objections filed are the. same as those in People v. Meerts, (ante, p. 210,) which is decisive of this case. For the reasons there given the judgment of the county court is reversed and the cause remanded.\nReversed and remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. L. Murphy, for appellant.",
      "C. N. Hollerich, and Gilbert F. Wagner, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People ex rel. Harry R. Smith, County Collector, Appellee, vs. M. Matkovitch, Appellant.\nOpinion filed February 17, 1915.\nSpecial taxation\u2014special tax for sidewalk is invalid if grade for the walk is not fixed. Where the ordinance for the construction of a sidewalk by special taxation under the Sidewalk act does not fix the grade for the walk but refers to a general ordinance, which, when introduced in evidence, contains no provision fixing the grade for the walk or the street nor any reference to any other ordinance which does fix the grade, and no other proof is offered showing that such grade has ever been fixed by an ordinance, the tax is invalid. (People v. Meerts, ante, p. 210, followed.)\nAppeal from the County Court of Bureau county; the Hon. J. R. Prichard, Judge, presiding.\nJ. L. Murphy, for appellant.\nC. N. Hollerich, and Gilbert F. Wagner, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0215-01",
  "first_page_order": 215,
  "last_page_order": 216
}