{
  "id": 4863192,
  "name": "The People ex rel. Henry Stuckart, County Collector, Appellee, vs. Daniel F. Crilly, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "People ex rel. Stuckart v. Crilly",
  "decision_date": "1917-02-21",
  "docket_number": "No. 11192",
  "first_page": "572",
  "last_page": "572",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "277 Ill. 572"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 130,
    "char_count": 1470,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.732,
    "sha256": "d455088b6afbbe9687c65f8a298227215d7710851070e99af22c414183c90754",
    "simhash": "1:49584ee707690ed9",
    "word_count": 248
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:59:20.170689+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People ex rel. Henry Stuckart, County Collector, Appellee, vs. Daniel F. Crilly, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Carter\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThis is an appeal of Daniel F. Crilly from the judgment of the county court of Cook county against his property for the taxes of Cook county, the taxes of the Sanitary District of Chicago and certain taxes of the city of Chicago for the year 1915.\nThe objections to the taxes and the decision of the trial court are the same as in the case of People v. Day, (ante, p. 543.) The briefs and arguments of the respective parties are substantially the same in that case as here and the questions involved here are there decided. For the reasons given in the opinion in that case the judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part and the cause remanded.\nReversed in part and remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Carter"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Cassoday, Butler, Lamb & Foster, (Ernest O. Best, and Beverly B. Vedder, of counsel,) for appellant.",
      "Maclay Hoyne, State\u2019s Attorney, ( Samuel A. Ettelson, Corporation Counsel, Charles Center Case, Jr., Eelsenthal & Wilson, William F. Strucicmann, Edmund D. Adcock, Ross C. Hall, Walter E. Beebe, Leon Hornstein, and Joseph F. Grossman, of counsel,) for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 11192.\nReversed in part and remanded.)\nThe People ex rel. Henry Stuckart, County Collector, Appellee, vs. Daniel F. Crilly, Appellant.\nOpinion filed February 21, 1917\nRehearing denied April 17, 1917.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in People v. Day, {ante, P- 543-)\nAppeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. John H. Williams, Judge, presiding.\nCassoday, Butler, Lamb & Foster, (Ernest O. Best, and Beverly B. Vedder, of counsel,) for appellant.\nMaclay Hoyne, State\u2019s Attorney, ( Samuel A. Ettelson, Corporation Counsel, Charles Center Case, Jr., Eelsenthal & Wilson, William F. Strucicmann, Edmund D. Adcock, Ross C. Hall, Walter E. Beebe, Leon Hornstein, and Joseph F. Grossman, of counsel,) for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0572-01",
  "first_page_order": 572,
  "last_page_order": 572
}