{
  "id": 5205221,
  "name": "Hannah Rattray et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Charles L. Wilson, Defendant in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Rattray v. Wilson",
  "decision_date": "1862-04",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "111",
  "last_page": "112",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "28 Ill. 111"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 70,
    "char_count": 664,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.436,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.4793276177203605e-08,
      "percentile": 0.28083007928261455
    },
    "sha256": "345175abfc80838e16ca35e57001dd3d25fb6b86da70967266af50283cbb9066",
    "simhash": "1:2ee1f32b98aa9994",
    "word_count": 115
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:21:34.240099+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Hannah Rattray et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Charles L. Wilson, Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Catox. 0. J.\nIt appeared on the trial that the plaintiff had the legal, and the defendant the equitable title. In an action of ejectment the plaintiff was entitled to recover. The other questions in this case have been considered in the case of Stow v. Kimball, at this term.\nThe judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded.\nJudgment reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Catox. 0. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "W. 0. Goudy, for Plaintiffs in Error.",
      "E. H. Kales, and G. Herbert, for Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Hannah Rattray et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Charles L. Wilson, Defendant in Error.\nERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CHICAGO.\nThis case, and that preceding it, were submitted on the same argument; and the facts correspond.\nW. 0. Goudy, for Plaintiffs in Error.\nE. H. Kales, and G. Herbert, for Defendant in Error."
  },
  "file_name": "0111-01",
  "first_page_order": 111,
  "last_page_order": 112
}