{
  "id": 4904516,
  "name": "The People ex rel. C. E. Robinson, County Collector, Appellee, vs. The Kankakee and Seneca Railroad Company, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "People ex rel. Robinson v. Kankakee & Seneca Railroad",
  "decision_date": "1918-02-20",
  "docket_number": "No. 11884",
  "first_page": "541",
  "last_page": "541",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "282 Ill. 541"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "275 Ill. 581",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2410633
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/275/0581-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 122,
    "char_count": 1305,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.741,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15431942171145885
    },
    "sha256": "8a355d922df1ac43c927e43532b9cb6705a817beb4632bfa0726efb43f37972d",
    "simhash": "1:4680c00e20144f12",
    "word_count": 224
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:14:24.875668+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People ex rel. C. E. Robinson, County Collector, Appellee, vs. The Kankakee and Seneca Railroad Company, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Farmer\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThis is an appeal from a judgment of the county court of Kankakee county overruling appellant\u2019s objections to a high school district tax and rendering judgment for the tax. The tax was levied for High School District No. 195, which was organized under the act of 1911. It-is contended, that act having been held unconstitutional in People v. Weis, 275 Ill. 581, there was no de jure or de facto board of education to levy the tax, and that being so, the action of the board in levying the tax was not and could not be validated by the curative act of 1917. We decided this question in a number of cases at the December, 1917, term contrary to the appellant\u2019s contention. People v. Mathews, (ante, p. 85;) Peoples v. Leigh, (ante, p. 17.)\nThe judgment is affirmed. Judgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Farmer"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "W. R. Hunter, for appellant.",
      "Wayne H. Dyer, State\u2019s Attorney, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 11884.\nJudgment affirmed.)\nThe People ex rel. C. E. Robinson, County Collector, Appellee, vs. The Kankakee and Seneca Railroad Company, Appellant.\nOpinion filed February 20, 1918.\nThis case is controlled by the decisions in People v. Mathews, (ante, p. 85,) and People v. Leigh, (ante, p. 17.)\nAppeal from the County Court of Kankakee county; the Hon. Jay H. MERRILL, Judge, presiding.\nW. R. Hunter, for appellant.\nWayne H. Dyer, State\u2019s Attorney, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0541-01",
  "first_page_order": 541,
  "last_page_order": 541
}